CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Complex Geometry Meshing

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 21, 2010, 09:38
Default Complex Geometry Meshing
New Member
Andreas P
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 12
andreasp is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone!

At our institute, we work on packed bed chromatographic separation processes of large molecules (e.g. proteins) solute in liquids. From the modelling point of view, one can think of a cylindrical column which is filled with randomly placed spheres. While the mixture moves through the column and diffuses into the spherical particles, proteins are adsorbed.

For detailed 3D simulations of such a process, we usually use a standard FEM approach, which handles the spheres and the interstitial volume separately. That is, these two domains have to be meshed independently. The solution process then considers different types of equations (convection+diffusion vs. diffusion+reaction) in the domains and accounts for a boundary condition between them (film transfer).

However, the main problem with this domain decomposition approach is that meshing of the interstitial volume can become extremely difficult. Very narrow gaps between the spheres either enforce extremely fine meshing or they can prohibit simulation altogether due to badly shaped elements. In any case, a lot of unpleasant meshing/testing/remeshing is required.

Now my question is if there is a smarter approach to solve these problems. Could the Extended FEM (XFEM) be a suitable alternative? Maybe, is it possible to mesh the complete column volume regardless of the different domains, solely accounting for them by discontinuity conditions? Or could finite volumes easier handle the problems (although I'm pretty sure that the meshing problem would exist just as well)?

I am completely new to this, so I would appreciate any hints and suggestions very much!

Thanks in advance
andreasp is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2010, 05:15
Senior Member
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 264
Rep Power: 15
Hamidzoka is on a distinguished road
you can try cartesian meshing technique.
it may increase cell numbers considerably compared with tetra mesh.
but mesh distribution is more controllable and high quality meshing will be achieved.
you can refer to "Dawes" artciles for this case.

Hamidzoka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 26, 2010, 16:16
Senior Member
John Chawner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Posts: 275
Rep Power: 14
jchawner is on a distinguished road

Hamid's suggestion of Cartesian grids is a good idea.

Depending on how much flexibility you have on the solver side, use of overset (aka Chimera) meshes might be interesting.

Now for the shameless plug. We've helped two customers recently solve meshing problems similar to the one you describe: one pertaining to voids in a foam the other to densely packed spheres in a fluid. Feel free to email to talk through these experiences.

Best Regards
John Chawner / /
on Twitter: @jchawner
jchawner is offline   Reply With Quote


fem, geometry, meshing

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[GAMBIT] Trouble meshing complex VOF geometry RPJones ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 2 February 14, 2011 19:54
[GAMBIT] Meshing complex geometry (Hull) vmeertens ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 26 March 29, 2010 11:24
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry EmersonKB CFX 5 July 2, 2009 09:17
Gambit Meshing complex geometry Edwin FLUENT 2 July 19, 2006 16:02
Meshing a complex geometry AJG FLUENT 2 June 29, 2005 09:39

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47.