CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Very Low Re: SST vs. v2-f?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 25, 2010, 05:34
Default Very Low Re: SST vs. v2-f?
New Member
César Vecchio
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Córdoba, Argentina
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 14
CAVT is on a distinguished road
Hello all.
I'm simulating the flow in an air-conditioned room having an extractor hood with reposition, in order to see the how much conditioned air is lost. So far I have made simple 2D transient simulations with laminar flow and then with SST turbulence model. I tried doing simulations with the v2-f model but it's harder to converge and there's no point in going so refined for a 2D simulation.
Now that I'm going for 3D, I would like to know if for these kind of flows an SST model would suffice, or if a v2-f model is more appropiate. According to the theoretical descriptions and some test results from other publications, the v2-f seems to be more appropiate, but I need a quite low y+, not so easy to achieve in my geometry if I want to keep simulation times down, and there the robustness of SST is tempting. I'm doing the runs in my PC, which is not exactly a number-cruncher, and I don't have access to a cluster.
The maximum flow velocity magnitudes are going to be less than 2 or 3m/s, and I also simulate convection with temperatures varying from 150ºC (a heat source) to 20ºC (intended air-conditioned temperature). I'm using Code_Saturne, and so far the 2D laminar and SST results are promising, even with coarse meshes and not differing much one from the other. My biggest problem is that I don't have experimental data to contrast with; I was only told "you should obtain no more than 10% or 15% of conditioned air lost", which is even an estimation, not sustained by measured quantities (despite that, I'm in that order of magnitude).
Such a low Re would indicate that a laminar attemp should suffice, but that's hard to afirm in reality given that in the ambient there will be people and stuff constantly in movement, dirt and who knows what else, that's why I suppose giving a try to turbulent models is justified, specially to see differences in convective flow. I don't need a great numerical accuracy, since I don't even have data to compare with. So... SST, v2-f (called phi-k in Code_Saturne) or some other?.
Thanks in advance.

CAVT is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low Reynolds Number SST Model Josh CFX 39 February 19, 2014 09:47
How to model Low Reynolds Turbulent in SST K-omega asghari FLUENT 0 August 18, 2007 04:31
Swirling flow in a diffuser: K-E over SST ? Felix CFX 3 February 27, 2007 22:03
Low Inlet Turb. Intensity - SST model not converge Pete CFX 0 November 12, 2005 02:26
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 06:12

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:56.