CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Unstructured CFD code; Difference ??

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 10, 1999, 03:35
Default Unstructured CFD code; Difference ??
J Roued
Posts: n/a

What are the main difference between the following unstructured CFD code:

Fluent 5.0 CFX 5.3 STAR-CD v. 3.1

Or it it difficult to compare ?

On the numerical solver fluent has both a uncoupled and coupled solver, CFX is a couled solver. STAR-CD ???

From viewing many www pages. Fluent and STAR-CD are the most used codes.

But is this a question about Fluent is for industris and STAR-CD for universities ??

Thanks in advance.


  Reply With Quote

Old   May 10, 1999, 11:03
Default Re: Unstructured CFD code; Difference ??
Raza Mirza
Posts: n/a
The use of unstrucutred meshes in CFD has been neccisitated because of complexities in real world geometries. Many techniques have appeared in the leading commercial codes such as CFD-ACE+, Fluent, Star-CD and CFX. One of the most commonly advertised capability is using triales (2D) or tetrahedra (3D). But these 'typical' elements fail to produce good mehses for turbulent flows.

Indeed all the unstructured codes are not the same. There are many diferrences besides the solvers. One of the key differetiting factors is the type of elements that is supported. CFD-ACE+ from CFD Research Corporation ( offers many unique features in this regard. I list some of the main discriminators below:

1. CFD-ACE+ supports 'arbitrary' polyhedral cells that gives maximum flexibility in generating and using computational meshes

2. CFD-ACE+ supports fully implicit 'arbitrary interfaces' across computational zones, resulting in tremendous saving in the mesh size

3. CFD-ACE+ provides a fully automatic (CAD-to-grid) Viscous Cartesian Mesh Generation, ideal for visous turbulent flows or otherwise

These discriminators are in addition to the common capabilities offered by other codes, such as

1. Triangular / Tetrahedral Mesh Generation and Support

2. Hybrid (prism-tet) Mesh Generation and Support

Please visit CFD Research Corporation website at to learn more about CFD Research Corporation and CFD-ACE+. You can also email me directly if you have any questions
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 1999, 13:03
Default Re: Unstructured CFD code; Difference ??
Judd Kaiser
Posts: n/a
I haven't personally used the other codes you mention. Based on the experience of our customers, the following are some of the relative strengths of CFX5.

- Ease of use. A consitent, intuitive interface. - Direct import of geometry from all major CAD vendors. - Advanced automatic hybrid mesh generation developed in collaboration with General Electric Aircraft Engines. Inflation from surfaces ensures good resolution of boundary layers. - Coupled multigrid solver developed and tested over the last ten years. Scalability is near linear. - Parallel processing with near linear speed up. - Unix and NT operating systems fully supported for serial or parallel solution.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD Salary CFD Main CFD Forum 17 January 3, 2017 17:09
OOP for CFD code Jongtae Kim Main CFD Forum 26 October 20, 2000 06:11
Customer Services Patrick Godon Main CFD Forum 32 August 23, 1999 06:55
educational software package recommendations Allan Morrison Main CFD Forum 5 April 5, 1999 12:07
What kind of Cmmercial CFD code you feel well? Lans Main CFD Forum 13 October 27, 1998 10:20

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54.