Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 May 12, 1999, 11:50 steady or unsteady #1 thomi Guest   Posts: n/a Hello there, I am curious about the best way to get a steady state (Q=const) for an incompressible flow field. Is either iterating until convergengence without a time contribution, or a 'pseudo unsteady' state calculation with a time discrtization (implicit or explicit) scheme recommended. I am trying to calculate heat transfer for a steady flow field. Thanks for your trouble Thomi

 May 12, 1999, 12:13 Re: steady or unsteady #2 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). The iterative approach and the accelerated transient approach are in a way related. (2). In other words, you can turn the iterative formulation into something like an accelerated transient formulation.( not a true transient) In the iterative solution, you have the old solution and the newly updated solution. These can be viewed as old time solution and the new time solution.

 May 12, 1999, 16:47 Re: steady or unsteady #3 thomi Guest   Posts: n/a Dear John, thanks for your reply, but which one is more effective (I mean which method ensures faster convergence? I guess the real steady state i.e without transient term? However, thanks for your reply

 May 12, 1999, 17:16 Re: steady or unsteady #4 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). In the transient flow approach, you are limited by the existing formula to compute the new solution. So, the option there is limited. (2). On the other hand, there are various methods available to speed up the iterative approach. In other words, you don't have to follow the real physics in the space of iterative approach. (3). So,I think, the use of iterative approach is more efficient for steady state solution. But this is just my feeling, I don't have actual numbers to prove it. This is especially true when our experience with transient flow are related to the use of transient compressible flow formulation, which normally takes a long time to converge. (4). It is maybe a good exercise to solve a problem with two different formulations to check out whether the iterative method is actually faster than the transient method for steady-state solution. It is a very good question. It may not be a bad idea at all to " jump to the conclusion"! instead of slowly reaching the conclusion. The iterative method is basically a guessing game where you can zoom in the final solution. I think this is an area which requires more research.

 May 13, 1999, 05:05 Re: steady or unsteady #5 thomi Guest   Posts: n/a Dear John, thanx again for your reply. Yes you are right I will make some benchmark tests to see which of the two is better. But I guess there won't be a universal conclusion, since it might depend on the flow problem to be solved. However, nice hearing from you. Thomi

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post elobb FLUENT 3 May 31, 2015 04:11 wlt_1985 FLUENT 6 December 4, 2010 17:17 nico Main CFD Forum 0 September 21, 2007 04:50 prem FLUENT 0 March 30, 2006 10:40 winnie FLUENT 1 April 28, 2003 11:30

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27.