|
[Sponsors] |
October 10, 2004, 06:59 |
Visual C++ vs Linux C++
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is C++ on linux better than Visual C++ for CFD?
|
|
October 10, 2004, 07:29 |
Re: Visual C++ vs Linux C++
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The C++ progamming language is defined by an ISO standard document; writing to its specification means you should be able to easily port your code on whatever platform you choose.
I am not sure what visual C++ offers you on top of the standard; this may make it easier to do e.g. graphics or buttons on Microshit, but it is totally useless on all other platforms. Hrv |
|
October 11, 2004, 04:49 |
Re: Visual C++ vs Linux C++
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
IMHO, the thing you get with Microshaft is a pretty good IDE. But you do have to pay for it.
|
|
October 11, 2004, 07:05 |
Re: Visual C++ vs Linux C++
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<table width="50%" > <tr><td> For purposes of standard CFD code, where standard means that you simlply calculate something and output as defined datas it does not make difference if you are using gcc under linux or visual c++ under windows. You can even use gcc under windows if you like it.
MSVC++ gives nice usability of interface and debugger and that is the reason why I am using it for developming of my CFD software. </tr></td> </table> Best, Maciej Matyka <A HREF="http://panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~maq/eng/">http://panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~maq/eng/</a> |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX11 + Fortran compiler ? | Mohan | CFX | 20 | March 30, 2011 18:56 |
How to install CGNS under windows xp? | lzgwhy | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 11, 2011 18:44 |
CGNS lib and Fortran compiler | manaliac | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 29, 2010 06:25 |
Dual Boot Windows and Linux and Go Open Source | andyj | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 21, 2010 16:49 |
Visual Fortran compiler and debugger on linux | CFD Student | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 26, 2007 06:26 |