CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Confusion about non-dimensionalization of NS eqns

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 17, 2010, 09:40
Default Confusion about non-dimensionalization of NS eqns
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 10
quarkz is on a distinguished road

It seems that depending on how the NS equations are non-dimensionalized, I can end up with 2 different eqns.

(*) denotes non-dimension

If I use

1. u(*)=u/(u infinity)
2. x(*)=x/c, c=chord length
3. p(*)=p/(rho*(u infinity)^2)

and either t(*)=t*(u infinity)/c or t(*)=t*f where f=frequency

I get 2 different forms of the final eqns ending with either Re or St and Re.

where St=f*c/(u infinity) and Re=(u infinity)*c/v

So how will this 2 eqns influence my simulation results? If I use different St, it will not appear in the 1st eqn because there is no St in the equation.

Or it does not matter? The results will be different but as long as I'm comparing against the same non-dimensionalization, it is fine.

quarkz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2010, 19:58
Senior Member
sbaffini's Avatar
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 815
Blog Entries: 17
Rep Power: 23
sbaffini will become famous soon enoughsbaffini will become famous soon enough
In non-dimensional analysis you express the dependence of your problem from a set of parameters and then try to make this parameters nondimensional by a proper choice of 3 (in dynamics) of them as a dimensional basis.

In your second case you are explicitly saying that there is some frequency f which influences your problem, hence it has to be nondimensionalized by the proper parameters from your basis (u_infinity and c).

However, if you use f as parameter for your dimensional basis you can't still use both u_infinity and c.

I'm more comfortable in thinking f as a parameter appearing in the B.C. of your problem (which still need to be nondimensionalized) that case the St is going to appear in your B.C. and the momentum eq.s assume their classical form.

In contrast, if there is no such a frequency affecting your problem, why would you introduce it?

Be aware of the fact that phenomena like the Von Karman Vortex Street do exhibit a characteristic frequency but this is not an independent parameter (hence useful to form a dimensional basis). Instead it strictly depends on the shape of the body, u_infinity, c and the fluid.
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 18, 2010, 09:21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 10
quarkz is on a distinguished road
Thanks sbaffini. I saw the NS eqns with St in a JCP paper which talks about simulating flapping wing in cartesian grid. In the paper, St= fL/U. f is an imposed freq, L and U are the length and velocity. So they are using U and L and f.

So in this case, Von Karman vortex street will be appear and hence St is included. But if it isn't, how will take influence the analysis? Will it be erroneous?

Moreover, the BC used in the paper is dp/dn = -St(Du/dt).n

Last edited by quarkz; November 18, 2010 at 10:32.
quarkz is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sub-domain Confusion Flaky CFX 6 October 7, 2010 07:40
Conservative and non-conservative form of NS eqns dtaydas Main CFD Forum 0 February 23, 2010 13:48
How to model the NR eqns in a domain with empty space Vasilis Main CFD Forum 1 April 14, 2009 04:35
Need help to solve N-S eqns with F.V.M vasilis Main CFD Forum 4 October 7, 2008 02:56
Help to solve 2 eqns simultaneously in MPI Zonexo Main CFD Forum 2 June 1, 2008 20:21

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:21.