# Confusion about non-dimensionalization of NS eqns

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 17, 2010, 09:40 Confusion about non-dimensionalization of NS eqns #1 Senior Member   TWB Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 136 Rep Power: 10 Sponsored Links Hi, It seems that depending on how the NS equations are non-dimensionalized, I can end up with 2 different eqns. (*) denotes non-dimension If I use 1. u(*)=u/(u infinity) 2. x(*)=x/c, c=chord length 3. p(*)=p/(rho*(u infinity)^2) and either t(*)=t*(u infinity)/c or t(*)=t*f where f=frequency I get 2 different forms of the final eqns ending with either Re or St and Re. where St=f*c/(u infinity) and Re=(u infinity)*c/v So how will this 2 eqns influence my simulation results? If I use different St, it will not appear in the 1st eqn because there is no St in the equation. Or it does not matter? The results will be different but as long as I'm comparing against the same non-dimensionalization, it is fine. Thanks!

 November 17, 2010, 19:58 #2 Senior Member     Paolo Lampitella Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Italy Posts: 742 Blog Entries: 17 Rep Power: 21 In non-dimensional analysis you express the dependence of your problem from a set of parameters and then try to make this parameters nondimensional by a proper choice of 3 (in dynamics) of them as a dimensional basis. In your second case you are explicitly saying that there is some frequency f which influences your problem, hence it has to be nondimensionalized by the proper parameters from your basis (u_infinity and c). However, if you use f as parameter for your dimensional basis you can't still use both u_infinity and c. I'm more comfortable in thinking f as a parameter appearing in the B.C. of your problem (which still need to be nondimensionalized)...in that case the St is going to appear in your B.C. and the momentum eq.s assume their classical form. In contrast, if there is no such a frequency affecting your problem, why would you introduce it? Be aware of the fact that phenomena like the Von Karman Vortex Street do exhibit a characteristic frequency but this is not an independent parameter (hence useful to form a dimensional basis). Instead it strictly depends on the shape of the body, u_infinity, c and the fluid.

 November 18, 2010, 09:21 #3 Senior Member   TWB Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 136 Rep Power: 10 Thanks sbaffini. I saw the NS eqns with St in a JCP paper which talks about simulating flapping wing in cartesian grid. In the paper, St= fL/U. f is an imposed freq, L and U are the length and velocity. So they are using U and L and f. So in this case, Von Karman vortex street will be appear and hence St is included. But if it isn't, how will take influence the analysis? Will it be erroneous? Moreover, the BC used in the paper is dp/dn = -St(Du/dt).n Last edited by quarkz; November 18, 2010 at 10:32.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Flaky CFX 6 October 7, 2010 07:40 dtaydas Main CFD Forum 0 February 23, 2010 13:48 Vasilis Main CFD Forum 1 April 14, 2009 04:35 vasilis Main CFD Forum 4 October 7, 2008 02:56 Zonexo Main CFD Forum 2 June 1, 2008 20:21