CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

About FEM methods

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 5, 2011, 03:29
Default About FEM methods
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
batabek is on a distinguished road
I want to know why Finite difference schemes are mostly preferred when numerically simulating fluid dynamics instead of using Finite Element Methods(FEM). Is it computationally expensive to use a discretization schema like FEM due to their large number of discrete element requirements ?
batabek is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 10, 2011, 06:25
Senior Member
Rami Ben-Zvi
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 152
Rep Power: 10
Rami is on a distinguished road
Hi batabek,

To start with, the most common practice in CFD is the Finite Volume Method (FVM) rather than the Finite Difference Method.

The reasons the Finite Element Method (FEM) is less common in CFD, in my view are mainly two:
  1. It is more complex, mainly if convection dominates, so some sort of upwind is required, and also due to difficulties arising when consistency with the shape functions assumed is to be preserved throughout (e.g., for the fluid properties, the BCs, etc.). These are simpler in the FVM, since usually everything is assumed constant withing each control volume (cell or cell face).
  2. Conformism - this is what was done for years...
I see no difference in cost between FEM and FVM for unstructured grid, since the calculations in both cases require some connectivity arrays (indirect addressing). In both cases, the accuracy with the same grid is similar or better for FEM (after all, the FVM is more-or-less a degenerated FEM, with constant shape functions and some additional assumptions). FVM can be more efficient if a structured grid is adequate, but this is hardly the case in real-life problems.

Rami is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2011, 03:22
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9
batabek is on a distinguished road
yeah volume preservation is a good point to consider, specifically in the incompressible flow. But I have not known FVM is dominant in the field until you said so. I thought FDM is more easy to implement in a computer.
batabek is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 18:28
Intl Conf Computational Methods in Fluid Power Jacek Stecki Main CFD Forum 0 November 10, 2002 06:49
FEM or FVM for CFD Astrid Main CFD Forum 18 December 15, 2000 01:02
FEM methods used in CFD? R.V.Ramkumar Main CFD Forum 3 August 5, 1999 02:02
FEM and VOF / Level Set Methods Christoph Lund Main CFD Forum 0 August 4, 1998 09:19

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49.