CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Use of upwind scheme for interpolation of u/v

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 22, 2011, 05:59
Default Use of upwind scheme for interpolation of u/v
  #1
Senior Member
 
TWB
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 10
quarkz is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I'm trying to use an upwind scheme for spatial discretization, assuming on a non-staggered grid.

If I need to compute the velocity flux u on the east face, depending on the scheme (e.g. 1st order upwind, QUICK), I will need to interpolate using pts i-1, i, i+1 and maybe i-2 or i+2.

However, what if I need to get the velocity v on the east face?

In a centered scheme, I simply interpolate v(i,j) and v(i+1,j). Does it differs now that I'm using an upwind scheme? I feel that I should still use the centered scheme because v in this case is not the outward flux.

I only use an upwind scheme if I need to get velocity v on the north (vertical) face. Is that so?

Thanks
quarkz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 22, 2011, 11:08
Default there seems to be some problems with your question
  #2
Member
 
Wu Jian
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Poitiers
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 10
harbinyg is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to harbinyg
do you mean the velocities are variable which are to be comput or not ?

if the answer is yes;

then normally you should linearlization your problem, as NS equations are nonlinear; --> the background velocity field are known; if you use collocated grid system, people usually use simple average method to obtain the value on the interface, other methods can also be used;

for the equations after linearation, if you choose segregretd algorithm, then you will not meet the problem you mentioned;
harbinyg is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 09:02
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
TWB
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 10
quarkz is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the help harbinyg!

the velocities are variables. However, I am using collocated grid with the variables attached to the cell centers.

I understand that I need to interpolate them to face values.

If I am using an upwind scheme, do I interpolate all u/v values using the upwind scheme?

For e.g, at east face, the u velocity is interpolated using an upwind scheme.

My key question is that do I use the upwind scheme to interpolate the v velocity at the east face as well? since v in this case is not the outward flux...
quarkz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 12:08
Default
  #4
Member
 
Wu Jian
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Poitiers
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 10
harbinyg is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to harbinyg
No, the velocity interpolation method is not linked to the schemes you choose ...
harbinyg is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 17:14
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
TWB
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 10
quarkz is on a distinguished road
Do you mean for both u and v at the east face?

Because for an upwind scheme, u east face value = u(P) if flow is from left to right, but = u(E) if the opposite, given that:

West ----- P ----- e (face) ----- East

As for v,

Is it the same? Or should I just use central difference?

Thanks!
quarkz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2011, 04:53
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 271
Rep Power: 9
leflix is on a distinguished road
Hi guys,

Generally one use the same scheme for every components u and v. But it exists some schemes which depend on local conditions and they swicth to some different expressions according these local conditions...
But if you want to use upwind scheme, use it for all components.
What you should know is that for Pe>2 (Pe is the Peclet number) then centered scheme is not appropriated because it will lead to spurious oscillations and the code may diverge. In this case you have to switch to upwind scheme.
So this means that if your flow in mainly x convected dominated the use of upwind scheme should be wise for u velocity while you could keep centered scheme for v.
It is always possibe to do so even if I found it a bit weird.
leflix is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2011, 04:10
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
TWB
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 10
quarkz is on a distinguished road
Ya, that's sort of what I am thinking as well. tks leflix!
quarkz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! Far Main CFD Forum 7 March 14, 2013 13:29
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! Far CFX 9 May 31, 2011 08:21
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) Far FLUENT 0 May 22, 2011 01:50
solution diverges when linear upwind interpolation scheme is used subash OpenFOAM 0 May 29, 2010 01:23
Drag comparison upwind vs. scheme Luk_Fiz CFX 3 April 27, 2009 21:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27.