CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Drag coefficient comparison

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 4, 2011, 08:47
Default Drag coefficient comparison
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8
momozzzz is on a distinguished road
Sponsored Links
Hi there guys,
I am working on improving a motorhome's aerodynamics. I have been doing 2D simulations of simple shapes to find what modifications would be best aerodynamically. Ive started with a simple rectangle, a rectangle with the top right corner curved and a rectangle with the rear top corner curved. the rectangle gave a high Cd which is understandable. the curved front encouraged the flow to attach to the body reducing the area of turbulence and therefore reduced the Cd by around 27%. however curving the rear whilst keeping the front square actually gave a higher drag coefficient than the original rectangle shape and i can not figure out why. the square front didn't allow the flow to attach, but i dont see how the curved rear would worsen the Cd. I have attached some contour plots. If any one has any idea i would be grateful!
Attached Images
File Type: png rectangle 3 velocity.png (54.4 KB, 15 views)
File Type: png rectangle 3 pressure.png (45.5 KB, 10 views)
File Type: png rectangle 2 velocity.png (46.6 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg rectangle 1 velocity.jpg (38.8 KB, 12 views)
File Type: png rectangle 1 pressure.png (55.0 KB, 6 views)
momozzzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old   September 5, 2011, 04:28
Senior Member
truffaldino's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 248
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 10
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Hi Mohammed,

This is known effect. For instance, rounding of car back could increase the aerodynamic drag (see image attached).

I think this happens because of additional pressure drop due to "centrifugial force" on the curvilinear part: perhaps in the case of the sharp corner the flow leaves the surface immediately and there is no pressure drop due to curvilinear motion, so the drag is lower. This might be the explanation, although I am not sure it is correct.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg boat_tail.jpg (93.1 KB, 21 views)
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2011, 06:52
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8
momozzzz is on a distinguished road
Hey Truffaldino
Thanks for the reply, you have been a great help!
momozzzz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2011, 18:37
Senior Member
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 480
Rep Power: 12
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
In addition to what truffaldino wrote, there *might* be a little more going on involving the separation bubble which occurs when the front is flat.

When the back side is rounded the reversed flow (which travels up the back) may increase the size of the separation bubble on the top side. This would decrease the pressure on the back side of the motorhome. All this stuff is very nonlinear, so it is just a thought.

If this is the case, then putting a horizontal lip on the back side and adding a fillet so the flow comes up the back side and flows backward might help reduce the size of the separation bubble on the top.

But, your simulation is 2D. So 3D will be much difference and probably not as severe.
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
drag coefficient in ansys fluent 12.0 krishna FLUENT 18 May 2, 2013 13:29
Incorrect Drag and Drag Coefficient for flow over a cylinder ozzythewise Main CFD Forum 8 June 13, 2012 06:24
Drag Coefficient Convergence Problem John FLUENT 16 September 4, 2009 02:44
Drag coefficient for parcels in dieselFoam sebastian_vogl OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 December 31, 2008 13:19
Automotive test case vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 October 27, 2008 09:43

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:51.