|
[Sponsors] |
June 27, 2005, 16:24 |
Fluent or CFX - strenghts, weaknesses?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi guys,
For Aerospace applications (up to transonic, internal, external flow, heat) - Can you give me your opinions of the software (Ansys CFX and Fluent) and maybe give me some details regarding their relative strengths and weaknesses? I am a Fluent 6.2 user, but have no experience with CFX. Thanks ! |
|
June 28, 2005, 10:07 |
Re: Fluent or CFX - strenghts, weaknesses?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
try STAR-CCM+ (CD-adapco's new code), hasnt got much multi physics but is very good for external aero so i have heard and is easy to use
|
|
June 30, 2005, 15:20 |
Re: Fluent or CFX - strenghts, weaknesses?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have no experience with Fluent, but CFX is strong with its turbulence models and its coupled solver. There's some nice results on aerospace benchmarks from the Flomania project. Contact your nearest CFX rep for details.
|
|
July 1, 2005, 04:27 |
Re: Fluent or CFX - strenghts, weaknesses?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I agree with Ben. Polyherdal meshing is lightyears ahead of what any other code is capable of doing. CD led the way with STAR-CCM...others need to play catchup.
Expect to see this technology in Fluent and CFX soon!! |
|
July 1, 2005, 12:14 |
Re: Fluent or CFX - strenghts, weaknesses?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yeah polyhedral meshes are v v impressive if the data that cd is putting out is correct it will be the way to go
|
|
July 3, 2005, 23:47 |
Re: Fluent or CFX - strenghts, weaknesses?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
have you people seen the results accuracy differences with same msh size calcualtions using tet and polyhedral meshes.
after thinking a little for my problems, i won't go with polyhedaral meshes. |
|
July 4, 2005, 18:24 |
Re: Fluent or CFX - strenghts, weaknesses?
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
March 15, 2010, 04:13 |
|
#8 |
New Member
william
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 16 |
try cfd-fastran
|
|
March 15, 2010, 06:32 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 19 |
Dear Riaan
CFX software is more compatible for turbomachine flows modeling compared with fluent. What i am going to propose is NUMECA. it is really a powerful software for the means of turbomachinery flows modeling. it can easily model the stages, cooling and bleeding, conjugate heat transfer, blade design and optimization analysis. it nas its own limitations. but i prefer it to CFX and invite to try it. regards |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comparison of fluent and CFX for turbomachinery | Far | CFX | 52 | December 26, 2014 19:11 |
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 03:54 |
CFX or Fluent for Turbo machinery ? | Far | FLUENT | 3 | May 27, 2011 04:02 |
Import CFX def into Fluent | eric_wang | FLUENT | 0 | April 18, 2011 14:14 |
Reynolds Stress Model in Fluent Vs CFX | Tim | FLUENT | 0 | December 6, 2005 23:03 |