CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Is J. Blazek's 2d unstructed code capable of computing fluid mach > 10 ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 4, 2011, 23:24
Default Is J. Blazek's 2d unstructed code capable of computing fluid mach > 10 ?
New Member
Guo Qinghua
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Nanjing
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 8
gchnhn is on a distinguished road
All the validation examples given is subsonic or transonic. He uses Roe flux, and a limiter(I forget which types limiter). I tried the naca0012, it is normal when machinf=1, but when i set machinf=2, the program fails to run.
Is Roe flux competent for supersonic flow theoretically? Or I need to change some other conditions to make it work?
gchnhn is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
Has anyone a detailed description of J Blazek's unstructed 2D code? gchnhn Main CFD Forum 0 November 3, 2011 05:38
non-dimensional analysis in Fluent Endee FLUENT 8 September 7, 2005 16:16
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 09:11
Design Integration with CFD? John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 19 May 17, 2001 15:56

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:56.