# Help: diffusive flux BC at wall

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 15, 2005, 23:39 Help: diffusive flux BC at wall #1 Quarkz Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links hi, i've written a non-staggered FVM NS solver based on fractional step in cartesian grid. i've used the BC based on peric's book which states that du/dx & dv/dy =0 at the wall, hence diffusive flux at wall=0. my diffusive flux are also handled implicitly now i'm modifying to structured grids. there's no transformation involved and i'm evaluating the fluxes in the physical face. hence, i'm still using u & v in x,y components Now along the wall boundary, du(n)/dn=0 as before. however, my cell centered vel are still in x,y components. how do i make use of du(n)/dn=0 or do i just neglect this condition? Thanks alot!

 July 16, 2005, 01:15 Re: Help: diffusive flux BC at wall #2 Ahmed Awad Guest   Posts: n/a A non moving solid wall BC in 2D is simply u=v=0 not their gradients, check your reference, the gradients equal zero at an exit BC

 July 16, 2005, 13:26 Re: Help: diffusive flux BC at wall #3 Mani Guest   Posts: n/a Why do you think du(n)/dn should be zero?? Maybe on a separation point but surely not in general. Doesn't Peric's book give you any information on boundary conditions on curvilinear walls? Maybe you should look beyond Peric's book, which is a little dated anyway.

 July 16, 2005, 17:19 Re: Help: diffusive flux BC at wall #4 andy Guest   Posts: n/a > I've written a non-staggered FVM NS solver based on fractional step : in cartesian grid. i've used the BC based on peric's book which states : that du/dx & dv/dy =0 at the wall, From continuity assuming a constant density. > hence diffusive flux at wall=0. No. The gradient of the tangential velocity components is most certainly not zero except for a stationary flow. You need either some log-law type expression for y+ > 20, to extrapolate the internal velocity gradient for y+ < 1 or something a bit more challenging in between.

 July 16, 2005, 20:34 Re: Help: diffusive flux BC at wall #5 Quarkz Guest   Posts: n/a well, that is strange. Quoted from peric's book (summarised): at wall, no slip condition applies ie fluid vel = wall vel. another condition can be directly imposed in a FVM; normal viscous stress is zero at a wall. this follows from continuity eqn e.g for a wall at y=0 (bottom), (du/dx)wall = 0 therefore (dv/dy)wall = 0 and tau(yy) = 0 hence diffusive flux at bottom wall = 0. similar for left/right wall, (du/dx)wall =0 so diff. flux tau(xx)=0. for complex geometry, (dv(n)/dn)wall = 0 hence tau(nn) = 0. can somebody verify this? btw, some BC are given in this message. is this correct? http://www.cfd-online.com/Forum/main...cgi?read=14551 thanks alot!

 July 16, 2005, 20:38 Re: Help: diffusive flux BC at wall #6 Quarkz Guest   Posts: n/a also see this message: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forum/main...cgi?read=13665 which states that: "In incompressible viscous flows, velocity divergence condition demands that the wall normal component of velocity has zero gradient along the wall normal" thanks

 July 16, 2005, 23:56 Re: Help: diffusive flux BC at wall #7 Ahmed Guest   Posts: n/a It is always a good idea to check Peric web site for latest updates ftp://ftp.springer.de/pub/technik/peric/newprint/ If you apply the continuity equation at the wall, then in the 2D case du/dx(wall)+ dv/dy(wall) = 0 Why are you taking du/dx(wall) equal to zero, under what conditions this is valid. Explain or send an email to Peric and put his reply on this forum

 July 17, 2005, 11:24 Re: Help: diffusive flux BC at wall #8 andy Guest   Posts: n/a > for complex geometry, (dv(n)/dn)wall = 0 hence tau(nn) = 0. : can somebody verify this? As Ahmed has said, it follows from continuity (constant density) and recognizing that the tangential velocity components are zero at the wall and hence so are their gradients in directions within the plane of the wall. It does not follow that the gradients of the tangential velocity components in the direction normal to the surface are zero. This is, of course, the boundary layer. I think confusion has arisen by using the word flux without stating the flux of what and we have not all been considering the same components. You must apply all required boundary conditions. If the wall is at an angle to the Cartesian axes then you need to consider what the imposition of boundary conditions expressed in wall coordinates means to the velocity components you are using as solution variables.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Barbaros FLUENT 1 August 5, 2006 02:00 tommy CFX 0 December 20, 2005 13:42 tommy CFX 0 December 15, 2005 09:14 Jason Phoenics 1 May 26, 2004 01:13 Andreas Borg FLUENT 0 June 7, 2000 06:27