 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
August 14, 2005, 11:29
|
Help for a bad SOR
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't understand why my SOR (relaxation) diverge for a Laplacian resolution in finite diference scheme. If anyone could help me, I can send you my code (F77). Thanks Davoche
|
|
|
||
|
August 14, 2005, 11:53
|
Re: Help for a bad SOR
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Drop me a line with code, I shall try to help
|
|
|
|
||
|
August 14, 2005, 16:50
|
Re: Help for a bad SOR
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
||
|
|
||
|
August 14, 2005, 18:16
|
Re: Help for a bad SOR
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks, but I don't think the SOR core is false.
In fact, I think the pb is link to my discretisation or stencil coefficient for the discretized Laplacian operator. Davoche |
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Use SOR or ADI for solving the time dependent reynolds equation | Hermano | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 5, 2010 09:47 |
| Red-Black SOR vs. SOR | rt | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 25, 2007 06:45 |
| Bad OpenGL Performance with FIRE GL2 using GAMBIT | Volker Pawlik | FLUENT | 1 | December 1, 2003 12:38 |
| Problems of Duns Codes! | Martin J | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 14, 2003 23:19 |
| How efficient is optimal SOR compared with other solvers? | Wolfgang Schmidt | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 13, 2000 09:09 |
Linear Mode
