CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

High Order B.C. for Finite Difference Method

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 19, 2005, 05:58
Default High Order B.C. for Finite Difference Method
Posts: n/a
Hello, could anybody tell me how to implement higher order (more the 2nd order) accurate B.C. at a solid wall boundary. I need to appximate velocity components for three ghost cells out of the flow domain.

For v = tangential velocity; u = normal velocity, I tried this: v[-1] = -v[1]; v[-2] = v[2]; v[-3] = -v[3]; u[-1] = u[1]; u[-2] = u[2]; u[-3] = u[3]; It is based on the same mass-conservation idea originally suggested by Harlow and Welch in MAC paper for one ghost-cell.

Another approach seems to be to get a polynomial based on the values inside the flow-domain and then estimate ghost-cell-values using this polinomial. For one ghost-cell, this approach matches with what is suggested in the above MAC apprach if linear approximation.

I think this is not a big deal for personals experienced in CFD. Please suggest me. I tried internet but couldn't get it!

Thanks a lot in anticipation!


  Reply With Quote

Old   September 19, 2005, 12:05
Default Re: High Order B.C. for Finite Difference Method
Posts: n/a

Without spending much time on this, I'd say you should not extrapolate information beyond 1/2 a grid point into a wall or everything will go berserk. At least, in the case of higher-order methods. Stay within the fluid. You can close 4th-order, interior first-deriviatives to third-order and be fine. Higher than that, life gets difficult. You can read about these topics in the following paper and those in the bibliography. Good luck!

Ken Mattsson, Boundary Procedures for Summation-by-Parts Operators, Journal of Scientific Computing, v.18 n.1, p.133-153, February 2003
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 19, 2005, 20:46
Default Re: High Order B.C. for Finite Difference Method
Posts: n/a
Hey, thanks a lot for the info. I will look into the paper you mentioned!!


  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[GAMBIT] Unable to create .msh file due high order elements on meshed face error Ty@flent ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 2 August 29, 2011 16:05
Vortex method vs High Reynolds number Weili Main CFD Forum 1 August 4, 2006 01:15
High order compact finite difference schemes Mikhail Main CFD Forum 6 August 5, 2003 10:36
finite difference method for navier-stokes problem dallybird Main CFD Forum 5 February 17, 2003 23:00
CFD method for High Re flow Toshiyuki Arima Main CFD Forum 3 May 29, 2001 11:18

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:53.