A stripes definition error

thu_wang · March 23, 2015, 20:29

Hi, all! when i start a fineturbo project in taskmanager, this error occurs:
---------------------------
STRIPE NUMBER : 1
Relative amplitude of R-coord. correction : 5.0692823E-02
Relative amplitude of Z-coord. correction : 0.5382730
! CORRECTIONS TOO LARGE - STRIPES DEFINITION SHOULD PROBABLY BE REVISED
EURANUS KILLED BY PROCESS 0
FLOW SOLVER CRASHED

---------------------------
what does it mean? where can I find the stripes definition?

colinda1 · March 30, 2015, 02:02

It is the rotor/stator interface when using conservative coupling that is having a problem in this case. Indeed the rotor/stator patches definition needs to follow the guidelines as detailed in the user manual as they have less flexibility than the full non-matching approach.

Best regards,
Colinda

March 23, 2015, 20:29	A stripes definition error	#1
thu_wang New Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Posts: 8 Rep Power: 11	Hi, all! when i start a fineturbo project in taskmanager, this error occurs: --------------------------- STRIPE NUMBER : 1 Relative amplitude of R-coord. correction : 5.0692823E-02 Relative amplitude of Z-coord. correction : 0.5382730 ! CORRECTIONS TOO LARGE - STRIPES DEFINITION SHOULD PROBABLY BE REVISED EURANUS KILLED BY PROCESS 0 FLOW SOLVER CRASHED --------------------------- what does it mean? where can I find the stripes definition?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[OpenFOAM.org] Compile OF 2.3 on Mac OS X .... the patch	gschaider	OpenFOAM Installation	225	August 25, 2015 19:43
Compiling dynamicTopoFvMesh for OpenFOAM 2.1.x	Saxwax	OpenFOAM Installation	25	November 29, 2013 05:34
[swak4Foam] installing funkySetFields	igo	OpenFOAM Community Contributions	1	November 20, 2012 20:16
Ansys Fluent 13.0 UDF compilation problem in Window XP (32 bit)	Yogini	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	7	October 3, 2012 07:24
OpenFOAM on MinGW crosscompiler hosted on Linux	allenzhao	OpenFOAM Installation	127	January 30, 2009 19:08

March 30, 2015, 02:02		#2
colinda1 Senior Member Colinda Join Date: May 2012 Location: Brussels Posts: 151 Rep Power: 13	It is the rotor/stator interface when using conservative coupling that is having a problem in this case. Indeed the rotor/stator patches definition needs to follow the guidelines as detailed in the user manual as they have less flexibility than the full non-matching approach. Best regards, Colinda