CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Fidelity CFD

AutoBlade for airfoils??

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 11, 2003, 16:18
Default AutoBlade for airfoils??
  #1
Steve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Greetings,

I am trying to create standard airfoil sections in AutoBlade (e.g. C-Series parabolic arc camberline and NACA 65-Series). I realize the code does not have these definitions explicitly. However, I was wondering if anybody out there has created these (or other standard airfoils) using the parameters available so I don't have to reinvent the proverbial wheel.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 2, 2003, 09:47
Default Re: AutoBlade for airfoils??
  #2
joe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
u'd better use the Desing3D module of NUMECA, it can design a parameter airfoil sections, then u can import a target file which is contact your NACA 65-Series to fitting the parameter airfoil !
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2003, 09:45
Default Re: AutoBlade for airfoils??
  #3
Steve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you Joe, good thought. This one has actually been suggested to me earlier. My hesitation with this is that it requires redundant definition of the problem, i.e., · find airfoil geometry generation tool that can provide surface coordinates given camber, thickness distribution, and LE & TE radius · convert this to .geomTurbo format · import to AutoBlade · perform fitting to recover parameters · export back to .geomTurbo format

This would be a good approach if I know that I was going to go through substantial parametric design effort via AutoBlade and Fine/Turbo. However, in this case, my blades are loaded well within typical range of the 65-series airfoils (in cascade) and I am more interested in quantifying off-design performance.

I have thought about trying this approach to recover some "base" parameters to then use for a family of airfoils. However, the control of camber and thickness distributions is touchy enough already that I fear it would not be generally applicable to obtain expected shapes.

What do you think – have you tried this?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help for Autoblade Fitting stewart Fidelity CFD 15 July 7, 2012 08:01
AUTOGRID and AUTOBLADE strengths and limitations Haider Fidelity CFD 1 December 6, 2007 20:24
help:AUTOBLADE haider Fidelity CFD 3 July 2, 2007 02:25
Low Re Airfoils Chan Main CFD Forum 0 September 23, 2003 21:22
Airfoils D. Brown FLUENT 5 April 19, 2000 12:14


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:34.