|
[Sponsors] |
January 29, 2007, 05:07 |
Problem: If the slip-boundary
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Rasmus Hemph
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 108
Rep Power: 17 |
Problem: If the slip-boundary condition is applied to one of the phases at a patch, the flux may still be different from zero. In my particluar case, where settling particles are simulated, the slip B.C applied at the bottom of the domain causes particles to exit.
Possible solution: I added a simple test to phaseModel.C, if ( isType<fixedvaluefvpatchvectorfield>(U_.boundaryFi eld()[i]) || (U_.boundaryField()[i].type() == "slip") ) { phiTypes[i] = fixedValueFvPatchScalarField::typeName; setting the flux to fixedValue for a slip B.C, which helped the result. This might have other implications which I am not aware of at the moment. This issue was discussed in the thread: http://www.cfd-online.com/OpenFOAM_D...tml?1169115307 //Rasmus |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boundary details, free slip or no slip? | Tiago | CFX | 5 | August 20, 2013 22:54 |
Confusion between 'non-slip' and 'slip' B.C | jinwon park | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 6, 2008 04:56 |
Free slip and no slip. | Yung | Phoenics | 3 | March 2, 2006 11:04 |
Free slip and no slip. | Yung | Siemens | 0 | February 4, 2006 10:37 |
free slip and no slip | sreenivas | CFX | 3 | November 13, 2003 07:17 |