|March 21, 2014, 18:08||
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,297Rep Power: 19
Timo, I saw you are still in Stuttgart, so I hope you still post in this forum. What you mentioned about the order of the regular sst and the sas-sst model in the code: Did you get any information about that? We would need to have a look at Fluent or CFX code to find out what Menter really does here, but as I guess OpenFoam programmers didn't have a chance to do that, so this differences are possibly just not done on purpose?
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
|March 24, 2014, 04:28||
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: University of Stuttgart
Posts: 66Rep Power: 8
I have not checked the code anymore about the order e.g..
And I am using 1.6-ext with hard coded wall functions in the SAS-model.
I would be careful with the SAS in OF in general, cause I have never seen a good validation with that model.
|May 12, 2014, 02:48||
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 77Rep Power: 6
Hi, I implemented the kOmegaSST-SAS as a RANS model. Feel free to test it, it's also the more recent formulation of the model.
|December 17, 2014, 06:17||
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 8Rep Power: 6
I'm facing the same error like podallaire at the very beginning of this thread, with the difference that I want to do a laminar simulation, which is in my mind completely weird.
I've set the simulationType to laminar in the turbulencePropertiesDict, as well as I've chosen laminar for the RASModel in the RASPropertiesDict (and of course turbulence off...).
When my solver tries to compute the discretization matrix tmp<fvVectorMatrix>, which is needed during the PIMPLE process, I get confronted with the following error message:
--> FOAM FATAL ERROR:
request for RASModel RASProperties from objectRegistry region0 failed
available objects of type RASModel are
From function objectRegistry::lookupObject<Type>(const word&) const
in file /usr/lib64/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-2.3.0/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/objectRegistryTemplates.C at line 198.
I'm wondering myself, why there is a request for a RASModel at all (since I'm forcing a laminar computation by setting the simulationType to laminar) and how to solve the problem.
Can anybody please give me a small hint or any additional informations about how to handle this problem?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|LES and SST together||Roland R||CFX||6||December 21, 2009 13:26|
|LES and combustion model||Margherita Cadorin||CFX||0||October 29, 2008 06:24|
|Differences between a laminar code and a les one||ben||Main CFD Forum||9||February 17, 2005 00:40|
|LES on two phase flow||Li Yang||Main CFD Forum||0||May 12, 2004 08:10|
|Some Questions about LES.||Bin Li||Main CFD Forum||2||February 20, 2004 10:58|