[akidess]

Unfortunately I didn't keep the logfile, but I think it broke when compiling swak4FoamParsers which allows for three cores. The CPU I compiled this on was a Intel Xeon E5-2650L 0 @ 1.80GHz.

[wyldckat]

Thanks! I've reported this here: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mantisb...iew.php?id=214 - and I'll try to figure out a way to fix this, as I really do like being able to build swak4Foam with multiple cores!

[vasava]

I am using openFoam 2.3.0 and running a case which has 4 phases with multiphaseEulerFoam. Is is possible to monitor mass flow rate for all four individual phases using swak4Foam? Could someone post a code that help me get started with this?

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by vasava

I am using openFoam 2.3.0 and running a case which has 4 phases with multiphaseEulerFoam. Is is possible to monitor mass flow rate for all four individual phases using swak4Foam? Could someone post a code that help me get started with this?

Yes it is possible.

Have you already had a look at one of the available presentations about swak?

The only tricky part would be that the new solvers have names for the phases like alpha.air and the dot bothers the parser. You'll have to add an aliases dictionary like

aliases {
  alphaAir alpha.air;
}

and then you can use a swakExpression like "phi()*alphaAir"

[vasava]

Thanks for the reply. I will look if I have that presentation if not I will ask for it.

[HappyS5]

Code:
inlet
{
type groovyBC;
variables "rpm=8000.0;Un=55.8;c=sum(pos()*mag(Sf()))/sum(mag(Sf()));n=sum(normal())/mag(sum(normal()));p=pos()-c;r=mag(p)+1.0e-10;R=max(r);xt=vector(n.y,-n.x,0);xT=xt/mag(xt);yt=vector(-n.x*n.z,-n.y*n.z,n.x*n.x+n.y*n.y);yT=yt/mag(yt);";
valueExpression "-Un*normal() + (rpm*pi/30)*((p & yT)*xT - (p & xT)*yT)";

c is the centre of the patch, n is the averaged patch normal.
}

Originally Posted by gschaider

The usage example of the swirl was not added by my to the page: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php?ti...730&oldid=9729

If I interpret Niklas' equations correctly he assumes that the swirl-axis is the Z-axis (and in your case it is Y if I understand you correctly). Use your mathematical common sense to reformulate it (& is the inner product of vectors. I think it could be shorter by using ^ for the cross-product)

Forgive me but I am learning, and it has been many years since I graduated.

Can someone specifically describe each variable and expression in the above swirl code by Niklas? I would like to use the code, but I try to know why mathematical concepts exist. I thank you in advance.

[Muyiwa]

Hello Foamers

Please show me how to use funkySetFields to create an undulating initial field for alpha.water in the damBreak tutorial. I want to use undulating surface instead of the boxToCell used in the setFields of the tutorial.

[Youngxl]

Hi Bernhard,
I just finished watching your video on swak4foam and pyfoam in the of workshop journal this morning, and I benefited a lot. But I noticed that you mentioned in the video that foam-extend doesn't have fvoption now. Is this true? I'm thinking about using fe-4.1 to do a problem, and I just want to use fvoption. If I can't use it, that's a pity.
With regards,
Young

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by Youngxl

Hi Bernhard,
I just finished watching your video on swak4foam and pyfoam in the of workshop journal this morning, and I benefited a lot. But I noticed that you mentioned in the video that foam-extend doesn't have fvoption now. Is this true? I'm thinking about using fe-4.1 to do a problem, and I just want to use fvoption. If I can't use it, that's a pity.
With regards,
Young

Forgot I mentioned that


Yes. AFAIK there are no fvOptions in foam-extend. Reason is (as far as I understand) that the developers of that fork think it is not a good idea to allow ThirdParty-code to mess around with the matrix (in that case a proper solver should be written). But not my project. So you better ask Hrvoje Jasak

[Youngxl]

Originally Posted by gschaider

Forgot I mentioned that


Yes. AFAIK there are no fvOptions in foam-extend. Reason is (as far as I understand) that the developers of that fork think it is not a good idea to allow ThirdParty-code to mess around with the matrix (in that case a proper solver should be written). But not my project. So you better ask Hrvoje Jasak

Okay, thanks for your suggestion!