 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
March 26, 2009, 07:59
|
Some clearance to mergePatch...
|
#1 |
|
Member
Marco Müller
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 17  |
Hi All,
after some very exciting lessons in blockMeshing I'll try to clear something, correct me if I'm wrong! 1. For face matching (see users manual) the conjoined blocks have to have the SAME definition vertices! Otherwise blockMesh won't find the connection and create a funny mesh with thousands of blocks and defaultFaces... 2. For face merging the conjoined blocks have to have DIFFERENT (duplicated) definition vertices! Otherwise the definition of merge-patches fails because of the same vertices... Think, this was never really explained and caused some of the problems faced during mesh generation with blockMesh in here. Marco |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [BladeModeler] BladeGen/ Turbogrid Tip clearance | Prak_32 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | February 4, 2018 09:31 |
| [TurboGrid] Tip Clearance Unequally Spaced | AtoHM | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | December 15, 2017 09:08 |
| non-constant clearance for BladeGen and TurboGrid? | yuhai | CFX | 0 | October 31, 2015 05:54 |
| Tip Clearance | Drona | CFX | 0 | October 17, 2002 05:25 |
| Convergence when clearance selected | dandy | CFX | 3 | November 14, 2001 11:06 |
Linear Mode
