|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh: non-manifold polymesh |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 3, 2013, 05:34 |
snappyHexMesh: non-manifold polymesh
|
#1 |
New Member
hans wurst
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi folks,
I'm using sHM to generate a mesh around some car geometry for aerodynamics calculations. However, due to defects in the input geometry, the resulting polymesh as a number of defects. Unfortunatly, my CFD knowledge probably is not strong engough to really judge how desasterous these defects are. I'd be very glad if you could give me some advice on this. So, the polymesh has the following defects: 1. checkMesh reports a multiply connected region. The input surface is not properly closed in this region, so that sHM generates a mesh in the interior as well. Except from the fact that the resulting polymesh is not really a proper discretization of the domain, is this non-manifold configuration tolerable or will this spoil the results in one form or another? 2. checkMesh reports a max. face skewness of ~8 in ~20 faces. Is this still tolerable or should I be concerned about the exactness of the results? Kind regards and thanks for your help, asdfhurz |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Running snappyHexMesh in parallel - optimizing | peterhess | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | January 3, 2018 02:54 |
Exhaust Manifold Transient Heat Transfer Simulation | Jonny6001 | STAR-CCM+ | 9 | February 22, 2017 13:24 |
[snappyHexMesh] How to define to right point for locationInMesh | Mirage12 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | March 13, 2016 14:07 |
Snappyhexmesh vertical manifold pipe in tank [SOLVED] | spk363 | Mesh Generation & Pre-Processing | 1 | February 17, 2016 19:51 |
[Gmsh] Import problem | ARC | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | February 27, 2010 10:56 |