|
[Sponsors] |
[Other] Effect of decomposepar/parallel on surface/mesh quality |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 3, 2015, 12:16 |
Effect of decomposepar/parallel on surface/mesh quality
|
#1 |
Member
Vineet Bhola
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Chemnitz, Germany
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi Guys,
I used snappyhexmesh first normally and then with parallel Servers using decomposePar and reconstructParMesh... Although it was quick using parallel Servers but the mesh Quality and consequentally surface Quality was compromised. Has anyone also seen similar phenomenon before? If yes, is there a way to control this? I was using on test geometries but when I will the bigger and more complex geometries, parallel meshing would be unavoidable. Thanks Vineet |
|
September 3, 2015, 12:18 |
|
#2 |
Member
Vineet Bhola
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Chemnitz, Germany
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 10 |
there was a Limit of 5 files...here is the 6th one for comparison
|
|
September 4, 2015, 03:59 |
|
#3 |
Member
Vineet Bhola
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Chemnitz, Germany
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 10 |
The only difference betweeen two approaches is how I use snappyhexmesh in my .sh script.
Please find it attached here |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mesh quality in fluent | luos | FLUENT | 0 | March 11, 2017 03:57 |
[ICEM] Unexplained changes of mesh quality and blocking approach | salumi | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 9 | November 23, 2016 05:14 |
Improve the mesh quality | bithnxtlz | FLUENT | 1 | April 30, 2016 13:20 |
[ICEM] How to improve bad quality elements that are obtained after creating prism layers? | Rohith Giridhar | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | July 11, 2015 19:04 |
[ICEM] Hex refinement negative quality afterwards | Anorky | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 8 | March 22, 2010 04:25 |