CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion

[snappyHexMesh] Avoiding prism (problamatic) cells while using snappy

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 2, 2018, 11:13
Default Avoiding prism (problamatic) cells while using snappy
  #1
Senior Member
 
Saideep
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: INDIA
Posts: 200
Rep Power: 8
Saideep is on a distinguished road
Hi;


I am trying to model a "2D - paddle" as in Fig 1 to use interfoam. Using snappy tool (OF-4x), I come across 2 issues and struggling to find a hack.


1. Using "snappy" with no layer refinement (as it is 2D) and adding layers results in capturing the accurate geometry of the .stl.



I used a 0 contact angle by placing the interface at the mid point of the paddle (along horizontal direction) and surprisingly the meniscus stays flat instead of spreading on the surface (Fig 2(initial), 3(after 1 milli sec)). I guess this is due to the prism cells on the boundary that are not perfectly oriented (they arent exactly a right angles triangle) and the cell faces are slightly inclined (Fig 4) causing issues while computing curvature (as curvature is divergence of interface normal).



2. Now, I try to add layers to have regular cells (rectangular) on the boundary. Now, the prism cells are pushed inwards and causing an issue when one fluid is pushing the other (as you can see there are multiple interfaces and the curvature is potentially completely wrong avoiding the spreading). (Fig 5)



In both the cases, the prism cells look to be an issue. Is there a way to avoid these or atleast merge them with neighbors.



I have tried several combinations of meshQuality controls but none seem to avoid or change the orientation of the prisms.



Any ideas ?!!
Thanks;
Sdp
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fig1.jpg (18.8 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg fig2.jpg (63.6 KB, 23 views)
File Type: jpg fig3.jpg (64.9 KB, 22 views)
File Type: jpg fig4.jpg (73.9 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg fig5.jpg (93.6 KB, 27 views)
Saideep is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2018, 03:29
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Gerhard Holzinger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austria
Posts: 277
Rep Power: 23
GerhardHolzinger will become famous soon enoughGerhardHolzinger will become famous soon enough
There is no way in snappy to avoid the prisms with such a geometry, since they are a direct result of the way snappyHexMesh works

You could try cfMesh, this should give you an all-hex mesh
GerhardHolzinger is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2018, 03:59
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
anonymous
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 340
Rep Power: 8
simrego is on a distinguished road
I think cfMesh will do nearly the same.
But for a simple geometry like this you can create a structured mesh with blockMesh pretty easily.


But what the hell is that diagonal stuff in pic 5? That's pretty weird...
simrego is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2018, 05:26
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Saideep
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: INDIA
Posts: 200
Rep Power: 8
Saideep is on a distinguished road
Thanks both!!


I have tried cfMesh earlier but instead of prism cells I have diamond cells and the behavior is similar to Fig 5 as attached in the earlier post. As you see in Fig5, adding layers pushes the prism cells into the domain and causes that sort of an interface (in simple words, the prism cells are trying to divide or layer the flow).

Ofcourse, this looks like a terribly simple geometry to model (and do doubt that sHM is doing its bit to capture the shape of stl) and solve but as you see it is not straight forward. I am not sure if you can mesh with blockmesh as you cannot capture the curves accurately any longer.

There could be several possibilities where it is going wrong here:
1. implementation of the contact angle bc in interfaceProperties.C

2. computation of interface curvature,
3. Prism cells.


I think the first two are not the case as they can be mathematically derived so only these few cells are problematic.



No clue how to deal with these.
Saideep is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
interface curvature, prisms, snapphhexmesh

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] Layers not growing at all zonda OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 12 June 6, 2020 11:28
ICEM - problems with prism mesh João Lourenço CFX 2 September 18, 2019 03:07
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh Segmentation Fault avd28 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 11 May 11, 2015 20:32
Icemcfd: Preventing prism inflation collisions? Joe CFX 1 July 31, 2007 09:13
physical boundary error!! kris Siemens 2 August 3, 2005 00:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49.