November 14, 2019, 22:41
|
Is this mesh bad or good?
|
#1
|
New Member
Sabrina Carson
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 9
|
Hello Foamers,
I have been having problem with running a simulation of flow boiling. The courant number has been shooting up very high (-250). I think there is some problem with the mesh because it is showning high max skewness. But, I want advice to know whether this mesh statistics suggest a good or bad mesh?
I have used refineMeshDict feature to refine at the same place twice. Can that be a problem?
Code:
Checking topology...
Boundary definition OK.
Cell to face addressing OK.
Point usage OK.
Upper triangular ordering OK.
Face vertices OK.
Number of regions: 1 (OK).
Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces...
Patch Faces Points Surface topology
cylinderWall 183600 184275 ok (non-closed singly connected)
outerWall 3400 3535 ok (non-closed singly connected)
bottom 9165 9667 ok (non-closed singly connected)
top 9165 9667 ok (non-closed singly connected)
side1 3700 3934 ok (non-closed singly connected)
side2 3700 3934 ok (non-closed singly connected)
Checking geometry...
Overall domain bounding box (-0.0124875 0.00433 -5.764448e-26) (0.0124875 0.024975 0.5)
Mesh has 3 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 1)
Mesh has 3 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 1)
Boundary openness (-2.316414e-15 -1.386644e-14 -4.473254e-18) OK.
Max cell openness = 2.989384e-16 OK.
Max aspect ratio = 51.0618 OK.
Minimum face area = 2.068277e-09. Maximum face area = 3.846066e-06. Face area magnitudes OK.
Min volume = 2.585525e-12. Max volume = 1.009628e-09. Total volume = 0.0001174849. Cell volumes OK.
Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 85.92242 average: 20.13237
*Number of severely non-orthogonal (> 70 degrees) faces: 270400.
Non-orthogonality check OK.
<<Writing 270400 non-orthogonal faces to set nonOrthoFaces
Face pyramids OK.
Max skewness = 1.384887 OK.
Coupled point location match (average 2.870544e-07) OK.
Mesh OK.
End
|
|
|