| saeed jamshidi |
December 24, 2023 08:37 |
snappyHexMesh with empty face type
Hello,
I'm wondering why it take longer time for execution of snappyHexMesh at the moment that I'm considering empty for front and back faces of my solution in comparison to the condition that front and back are patch or symmetry type?!
Shall I consider
Code:
defaultPatch
{
name frontAndBack;
type empty;
}
istead of below type?
This is my blockMeshDict:
Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| ========= | |
| \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox |
| \\ / O peration | Version: v2112 |
| \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com |
| \\/ M anipulation | |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
object blockMeshDict;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
scale 1;
vertices
(
(-0.4 -0.4 0.01) //0
(1 -0.4 0.01) //1
(1 0.4 0.01) //2
(-0.4 0.4 0.01) //3
(-0.4 -0.4 -0.01) //4
(1 -0.4 -0.01) //5
(1 0.4 -0.01) //6
(-0.4 0.4 -0.01) //7
);
blocks
(
hex (4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3) (140 80 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
);
edges
(
);
boundary
(
inlet
{
type patch;
faces
(
(0 4 7 3)
);
}
outlet
{
type patch;
faces
(
(1 5 6 2)
);
}
topAndBottom
{
type patch;
faces
(
(3 2 6 7)
(0 1 5 4)
);
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
faces
(
(0 1 2 3)
(4 5 6 7)
);
}
);
mergePatchPairs
(
);
// ************ ************************************************************* //
I would appreciate it if you help me in this matter. |
