|March 7, 2010, 05:52||
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4Rep Power: 9
i created a very simple 2D model: two blocks connected with a thinner block. Using the mesh created by blockmesh i get reasonable results, while using a mesh with triangular cells with same cell lengths, no internal angle less then 45 deg. i am getting results surely not valid.
First question: the usage of triangular cells does make sense?
Second question: does the orientation of faces (i.e. sequence of numbering of points definif a face) can explain the difference of results?
Third question: checkMesh tool could be a useful tool to understand the validity of the mesh, where can i find the definition of check actually done by checkMesh?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|[ICEM] Generating Mesh for STL Car in Windtunnel Simulation||tommymoose||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||48||April 15, 2013 04:24|
|unv mesh corrupted after createPatch||maddalena||OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities||1||February 18, 2010 08:43|
|Quad and Triangular Mesh||Sham||FLUENT||0||April 5, 2007 01:39|
|Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option?||Joe||CFX||2||March 26, 2007 18:10|
|Mesh||Mignard||FLUENT||2||March 22, 2000 06:12|