|
[Sponsors] |
[OpenFOAM] Difference in the number of cells between ParaView and checkMesh |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 15, 2015, 07:39 |
Difference in the number of cells between ParaView and checkMesh
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello everyone,
I'm comparing the efficiency of different snappyHexMesh meshes and to do so I'm paying attention to the number of cells of the mesh. And I made the weird discovery that checkMesh and ParaView don't agree on the number of cells of the mesh! For example, for the same mesh, the Statistics inspector of ParaView gives 3.995.096 cells: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_T...ew?usp=sharing While the checkMesh result gives 1.105.136 cells: Code:
Create time Create polyMesh for time = 0 Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 1593493 faces: 3707462 internal faces: 3262532 cells: 1105136 faces per cell: 6.3069106 boundary patches: 3 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 0 And any explanations for this huge difference? I have compared several meshes and the ratio is typically around 4 in favor of ParaView everytime. Martin |
|
January 18, 2016, 04:46 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello everyone !
I have noticed exactly the same thing a few days ago! Does someone has an idea why there is such a difference ? I would tend to trust more the data informations given by "checkMesh", but should I ? Thanks in advance. |
|
January 18, 2016, 04:54 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
If I remember correctly (unfortunately I can't remember where I read it though), Paraview and the rest can't handle polyhedral cells, and instead decompose it to tets and the like. Consequently the number reported by Paraview would be higher, because of this decomposition. If I can find the link to the post on this, I will put it here. Hope this helps. Cheers, Antimony |
|
January 18, 2016, 05:01 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10 |
Wow it makes sense!
Thanks a lot! |
|
January 29, 2017, 15:31 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Himanshu Sharma
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
Did you find the link. Thank you. |
||
January 30, 2017, 01:57 |
|
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 12 |
Hey,
this topic has been analyzed here (with a few examples as well): Exporting mesh for an OpenFOAM chtMultiRegion case |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM] Visualizing checkMesh results in Paraview | Claudio | ParaView | 15 | July 21, 2020 13:58 |
[blockMesh] checkMesh Floating point exception error | daniel.almeida | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | July 31, 2015 14:26 |
[Other] Different number of cells | Yuby | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | May 10, 2015 14:12 |
[OpenFOAM] ParaView shows bad cells, checkMesh doesn't seem to notice. | CoolHand | ParaView | 2 | August 21, 2014 15:58 |
Visualize checkMesh output with Paraview | Horus | OpenFOAM | 1 | May 29, 2012 11:51 |