Forces (in controlDict) Giving Results 1/10 of Experimental Comparison
Hello all,
I am running a simulation on a NACA 0012 airfoil, and after confirming that my simulation yields very similar Cp plots to the experimental results, I am now trying to match Cl to the experimental data. The case in question is at 13 deg alpha, and while I should be getting a Cl of ~1.34, the forceCoeffs.dat file shows 0.134. The Cd is also coming out negative... The forces sub-dict of controlDict is as follows: Code:
forces Thanks, Dan |
Follow-Up
1 Attachment(s)
I will add some additional information:
Code:
Cd Cl Cm The graph of the Cp results suggest that the data should be accurate. However, integrating the data yields low results for Cd and Cl, while Cm is way off the mark. Is it just a coincidence that the OF Cl data is 10% of the experimental value? Has anyone successfully integrated OF Cp results to yield Cl, Cd and/or Cm that are similar to experimental data? I would appreciate any assistance that is offered. Regards, Dan |
The Aref is chordLength*width, so check that and run again your simulations, you may get better values after that.
Check also your Re number, it should be the same as in the transportProperties file. |
Thanks, there was a problem with the setup that fixed Cl. Cd and Cm have a greater error margin, though.
Dan |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:26. |