|
[Sponsors] |
April 4, 2016, 05:00 |
Asymmetric boundary conditions
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 83
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
I am simulating flow in a pipe, but had to size down to a 2D model as I am limited by the computer power I have. The simulations are laminar simulations and I compared by velocity results with Hagen-Poiseuille flow. I do not get the correlation of U_max=2*U_av. Instead I get 1,5 for all my models. I read that in Fluent it is possible to define asymmetric boundary conditions, to solve the flow still in 2D, but gain "correct" results. Is this possible as well in OF? My velocity boundary is defined as the following until now: Code:
dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0]; internalField uniform (2 0 0); boundaryField { inlet { type fixedValue; value $internalField; } outlet { type inletOutlet; inletValue uniform (0 0 0); value $internalField; } "(wall1|wall2|wire-upstream|wire-downstream|wire-north|wire-south)" { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } "(bottom|top)" { type empty; } } Thank you very much! Best regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 07:38 |
CGNS Boundary conditions using SU2 | denzell | SU2 | 3 | July 9, 2018 05:58 |
Problem in setting Boundary Condition | Madhatter92 | CFX | 12 | January 12, 2016 04:39 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 06:28 |
Low Mixing time Problem | Mavier | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2013 00:00 |