|
[Sponsors] |
Outlet Boundary Conditions to Prevent Backflow |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hi,
I am using twoLiquidMixingFoam solver. I have a single inlet and two outlets in a symmetrical geometry. At the inlet, I specify a uniform velocity and a zeroGradient Prgh. At the outlet, I specify Prgh = 0 and pressureInletOutletVelocity. I get a back flow at the outlets. I tried to use over velocity boundary conditions at the outlet such as the zeroGradient, inletOutlet and flowRateOutletVelocity, but the issue persists. I have also extended the geometry, but it did not resolve the problem. I would appreciate any assistance. Please let me know if any further details are required. Thanks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22 ![]() |
Does using type inletOutlet with inletValue 0.0 not help? This should do, what you want.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hi, Thanks for the reply.
Please find attached document that has the details and snapshots of the results. I look forward to hearing from you. Kindly, let me know if further information is required. Thanks CFD_Online_compressed.pdf |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hi jherb,
I would appreciate your assistance. Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22 ![]() |
For Outlet1 and Outlet2 try the following boundary condition for U:
Code:
"Outlet(1|2)" { type inletOutlet; value uniform (0.0 0.0 0.0); // just use for initialization inletValue uniform (0.0 0.0 0.0); // this should prevent inflow } see e.g. https://github.com/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM.../TJunction/0/U |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Dear jherb,
Thanks for the reply. I have used that already; however, the problem persists. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22 ![]() |
Are there walls (vertically in your picture) between the inlet and the outlet? Are you sure, it is not physically correct, that there is inflow from the outlets if you have a pressure boundary?
If you use inletOutlet, have you checked the values on the faces of the patch? So explicitly loading the patches in paraview? They might be zero, even if the cell center values show inflow. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hi,
Yes there are physical walls between the inlet and outlets. I believe that it is not physically correct to have a back flow. What I simulate is a fraction of a very long geometry in real life. The backflow gets worse when the inlet channel is shifted from the center line. In that case, the flow gets back to the domain and messes up the results (not just only at the outlet boundaries). For example, I tried shifting the injector to the extreme right, leaving a narrow gap for the flow to escape to the outlet. In this case, I always get terrible backflow, as if the flow leaves one outlet and enters the second outlet. I would appreciate your thoughts on the above. Thanks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multiphase flow - incorrect velocity on inlet | Mike_Tom | CFX | 6 | September 29, 2016 01:27 |
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation | MichaelK | CFX | 12 | September 1, 2016 05:15 |
Setting rotating frame of referece. | RPFigueiredo | CFX | 3 | October 28, 2014 04:59 |
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids | ashtonJ | CFX | 6 | August 11, 2014 14:32 |
Low Mixing time Problem | Mavier | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2013 00:00 |