|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Hello,
I am new to the use of OpenFoam in Fire Modelling, and I am wondering what is the difference between the two soot models available (mixtureFractionSoot<gasEThermoPhysics> and mixtureFractionSoot<gasHThermoPhysics>) and also what do the coefficients mean (nuSoot and Wsoot). I already looked on google and on openfoam.org / openfoam.com + on this forum and it seems like my question hasn't been asked before. Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kur...sh_revised.pdf :
WSoot = molecular weight of soot nuSoot= number of moles of soot I still dont get the difference between the two soot models though, if anyone can help |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Yann
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: France
Posts: 1,279
Rep Power: 29 ![]() ![]() |
Hi Margaux,
To my knowledge, there is only one soot model implemented in OpenFOAM: mixtureFraction. (https://github.com/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM...tureFraction.H) The difference between gasEThermoPhysics and gasHThermoPhysics is only related to the thermophysical properties. You can either choose a thermo package based on the enthalpy (H) or the internal energy (E). The form of energy you are using is defined in thermoType in the thermophysicalProperties file. Have a look here : https://cfd.direct/openfoam/user-gui...#x36-2690007.1 It doesn't make a difference in the soot model, it only changes the form of the energy being solved. Cheers, Yann |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Thank you for your answer, I get the difference now !
have a nice day ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
New Member
陈玮
Join Date: Mar 2022
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
New Member
Niklas
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hi,
did this worked? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
New Member
Niklas
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
New Member
Hafiz Ahmad
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Brunei
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
You could try this solver: https://github.com/acuoci/laminarSMOKE.git
It's called laminarSMOKE and it can perform detailed soot simulation for laminar flames. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
firefoam, mixturefractionsoot, soot |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is it possible to do soot sectional method modelling with Fluent?? | roytorc | FLUENT | 1 | August 22, 2019 01:37 |
soot modelling without chemistry | Svetlana | CFX | 4 | March 7, 2019 22:41 |
soot oxidation rate in porous wall | Weiqiang Liu | FLUENT | 0 | January 9, 2019 12:41 |
Unsteady soot modelling | swethaprakash | FLUENT | 0 | February 1, 2016 06:49 |
Soot modelling | iyerganapathyv | CFX | 0 | February 13, 2006 06:12 |