CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Pre-Processing

Reynolds number

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By boger
  • 2 Post By Nico A.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 11, 2011, 07:57
Default Reynolds number
  #1
Member
 
Evangelos
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 14
Danath is on a distinguished road
Hi

i have run my case with "nu nu [ 0 2 -1 0 0 0 0 ] 0.01"

Now i want to change Reynolds number
for example i want to rum my case with reynolds number 60 what can i do?

i am a little bit confused with the tutorial!
Danath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2011, 09:54
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
David Boger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Penn State Applied Research Laboratory
Posts: 146
Rep Power: 17
boger is on a distinguished road
Check the definition of Reynolds number. Your flow field is characterized by the kinematic viscosity (nu) but also some characteristic velocity (probably through your boundary conditions) and length (through some aspect of your mesh). You'll need all three to calculate (or change) your Reynolds number.
Danath likes this.
__________________
David A. Boger
boger is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 15, 2011, 06:24
Default
  #3
Member
 
Evangelos
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 14
Danath is on a distinguished road
Re = (4 Rh U)/ν

because i know U =1m/s and i know Re for example Re= 50
i know Rh =1^2/4 (non-cylindrical conductors)
so
ν= 1*1/50 = 0.02

"nu nu [ 0 2 -1 0 0 0 0 ] 0.01" i suppose if i want to run my case with Re= 50 i will change 0.01 with 0.02 is this right ?
Danath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 15, 2011, 08:17
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Magdeburg, Germany
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 15
Nico A. is on a distinguished road
Hello Danath,
you are right with the new kinematic viscosity. generally you can either change the viscosity or the velocity (for a constant geometry) to change the Reynolds Number. I often prefered changing the velocity for demonstrative purpose, because it is direct proportional.
Danath and cesarjets like this.
Nico A. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2012, 06:07
Post
  #5
kid
Senior Member
 
cfdkid
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 17
kid is on a distinguished road
Hi,
Sorry if i case any confusion here but can you through light on this.
Suppose my fluid is air and knowing the input boundary condition i extract V and nu for a given Re.
So, what i have done is calculate and place both V and nu for a given Re as my boundary condition.
But does it agree with what ypu said above?

Regards
CFDkid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nico A. View Post
Hello Danath,
you are right with the new kinematic viscosity. generally you can either change the viscosity or the velocity (for a constant geometry) to change the Reynolds Number. I often prefered changing the velocity for demonstrative purpose, because it is direct proportional.
kid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2012, 02:36
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Magdeburg, Germany
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 15
Nico A. is on a distinguished road
Hey kid,

I think there is a conflict in what you said. Before starting the simulation it should be clear if you want to a flow for a specific Re, velocity or
viscosity.
Example: you consider an air flow, nu is given (nu=1.54*E-5 m²/s at 20°C), for one given geometry, the hydraulic diameter is constant and to receive Reynolds Number of e.g. Re=60, -> adjust the velocity in the boundary condition.

Best regards
Nico
Nico A. is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with decomposePar tool vinz OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 18 January 26, 2011 02:17
Reynolds Number and Heat transfer Coefficient panos_metal FLUENT 0 January 7, 2011 06:37
Low Reynolds Number k-epsilon formulation CFX 10.0 Chris CFX 4 December 7, 2009 23:51
Reynolds Number Matt CFX 0 February 25, 2009 05:40
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 July 15, 2005 04:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:28.