
[Sponsors] 
March 26, 2014, 06:39 
negative time step, possible to set?

#1 
Member
Tom
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 7 
hi there,
Do you know if it possible to introduce in OF, icoFoam algorithm in particular, a time step (adjusted or not) which is negative? I mean, can I run a simulation in OF that start from t=0 and it goes till t=tstar with tstar<0 with a deltaT<0? Thank you in advance Regards 

March 26, 2014, 12:50 

#2 
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 735
Rep Power: 21 
I don't believe you can do that with the default time classes, as there is only has increment operator:
http://foam.sourceforge.net/docs/cpp/a02579.html I'm not sure in what situation these would be useful. If you really wanted it you would have to have your own time counter and decrement it, although this would only mean that your simulation was still evolving forward in time and you've flipped your time axis. That, or you could find a flux capacitor and drive 88 mph... 

March 26, 2014, 12:57 

#3  
Member
Tom
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 7 
Quote:
Anyway my question was bad posed. Indeed the equation I want to solve are not NS classic ones but a motification of them with the temporal term which is going to be ddt(U)...OF icofoam solver comes to be just the skeleton of the algorithm... How can I create "my own time counter"? Thank you in advance to support my idea 

March 26, 2014, 13:06 

#4 
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 735
Rep Power: 21 
I don't think you would need a negative timestep to do what you want. Is ddt(U) negative because it absolutely needs to be, or just because its on the RHS of the equation you are solving (a reference to the equations you are solving would be helpful)?


March 26, 2014, 13:15 

#5 
Member
Tom
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 7 
No, it is not just a change of hand side. It is the prescription of the equation, indeed I am dealing with the Adjoint Navier Stokes equation wich prescribe this procedure...


March 27, 2014, 05:40 

#6  
Member
Tom
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: France
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 7 
Quote:
I mean leaving the time flows as positive but introducing at the place of Dt the term 1*Dt in the CrankNicholson schemes... My question at this point could be. If it is possible, where is that OF does compute the CrankNicholson scheme, where is the exact file where it does the discretization? 

November 6, 2014, 05:36 

#7 
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7 
Dear Tom, Dear Foamers,
In my point of view, the problem here is to set the right boundary conditions in time for the adjoint NSE. To make sure, that the problem is well posed, one definitely is forced to compute the solution of ANSE backward in time. Tom, did you find a way to realize a computation in openFOAM with negative timeSteps? I tried a lot so far, but haven't find a satisfying answer yet, so even short hints might be very useful ( I hope you're still familiar with the subject posted above...). Kind regards Tom 

Tags 
negative time step 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
simpleFoam error  "Floating point exception"  mbcx4jc2  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  12  August 4, 2015 02:20 
InterFoam negative alpha  karasa03  OpenFOAM  7  December 12, 2013 04:41 
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end  xiuying  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  8  August 27, 2013 15:33 
error message with modeling a cube with a hold at the center  hsingtzu  OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh  2  March 14, 2012 10:56 
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3  bookie56  OpenFOAM Installation  8  August 13, 2011 04:03 