want to create volscalarField Object using just runTime Objects.

fedvasu · July 7, 2015, 18:44

Here is how we typically define, volScalarField Objects

Code:

 mu_
    (
        IOobject
        (
            phasePropertyName("thermo:mu"),
            mesh.time().timeName(),
            mesh,
            IOobject::NO_READ,
            IOobject::NO_WRITE
        ),
        mesh,
        dimensionSet(1, -1, -1, 0, 0)
    )

but we don't require mesh object to create IOobject, we may use runTime object of type Time,

Code:

 mu_
    (
        IOobject
        (
            phasePropertyName("thermo:mu"),
            runTime.timeName(),
            runTime,
            IOobject::NO_READ,
            IOobject::NO_WRITE
        ),
        mesh,
        dimensionSet(1, -1, -1, 0, 0)
    )

I want to know if we can forgo mesh object, in the next argument or maybe we can create an object of subtype of fvMesh class? something like this,

Code:

 mu_
    (
        IOobject
        (
            phasePropertyName("thermo:mu"),
            runTime.timeName(),
            runTime,
            IOobject::NO_READ,
            IOobject::NO_WRITE
        ),
        GeoMesh<runTime>,
        dimensionSet(1, -1, -1, 0, 0)
    )

is it possible? have you trued it before, my constraint is I don't have an object of type fvMesh readily available.

fedvasu · August 4, 2016, 15:06

Yes it is possible.

It is exactly as I have written.

runTime and mesh are derived from the same base class.

July 7, 2015, 18:44	want to create volscalarField Object using just runTime Objects.	#1
fedvasu Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 92 Rep Power: 14	Here is how we typically define, volScalarField Objects Code: mu_ ( IOobject ( phasePropertyName("thermo:mu"), mesh.time().timeName(), mesh, IOobject::NO_READ, IOobject::NO_WRITE ), mesh, dimensionSet(1, -1, -1, 0, 0) ) but we don't require mesh object to create IOobject, we may use runTime object of type Time, Code: mu_ ( IOobject ( phasePropertyName("thermo:mu"), runTime.timeName(), runTime, IOobject::NO_READ, IOobject::NO_WRITE ), mesh, dimensionSet(1, -1, -1, 0, 0) ) I want to know if we can forgo mesh object, in the next argument or maybe we can create an object of subtype of fvMesh class? something like this, Code: mu_ ( IOobject ( phasePropertyName("thermo:mu"), runTime.timeName(), runTime, IOobject::NO_READ, IOobject::NO_WRITE ), GeoMesh<runTime>, dimensionSet(1, -1, -1, 0, 0) ) is it possible? have you trued it before, my constraint is I don't have an object of type fvMesh readily available.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How to create initiate a volScalarField p without reading from disk NO_READ does not seem to work	dbxmcf	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	14	March 25, 2022 07:08
Meshing a Sphere	Ajay	FLUENT	10	September 3, 2016 15:18
Where's the singularity/mesh flaw?	audrich	FLUENT	3	August 4, 2009 02:07
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs	hjasak	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	11	August 15, 2008 08:36
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file	SSL	FLUENT	2	January 26, 2008 12:55

August 4, 2016, 15:06		#2
fedvasu Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 92 Rep Power: 14	Yes it is possible. It is exactly as I have written. runTime and mesh are derived from the same base class.