|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Ved Mukherjee
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hello, I have made a solver by merging the sonicFoam and mhdFoam.The B magnetic field density vector is coupled with rho to form compressible equation but the graph shows high oscillations and pressure and velocity graph is still the same,though I have added the magnetic terms in the equation. Can anybody explain me the reason behind these problems.
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,969
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 127 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quick answer: I would actually like to try and explain this, but I can't figure out what exactly is going on from your description
![]() Please follow the instructions given here: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...-get-help.html Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Ved Mukherjee
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
The graph is of B field. The pressure and velocity graphs are still the same as Euler's equations. I am asking what should I change ? Piso algorithm or something else
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,969
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 127 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi vedlk,
I've taken a look into the two solvers and it is indeed possible that you might have confused something in the merger of the two solvers. The last version of OpenFOAM to have sonicFoam in PISO form is 2.1.x: https://github.com/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM...am/sonicFoam.C As for the B graph, I guess you are referring to the residuals plot? If so, then it is possible that there was an implementation problem when merging the two solvers. If you are referring to the B field itself, i.e. the results, it's possible that the results for the B field might actually make sense, depending on how the flow profile is going in the sonic range, because a very high pressure or high turbulence region can have significant impact on the electromagnetic profiles, since I can only imagine that the molecules do not take any specific orientation that would lead to a common magnetic orientation. If using the sonicFoam from 2.1.x as a basis still gives you the same results/problems, then please follow the instructions given here: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...-get-help.html Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
mohd nor hazwan bin hadzir
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
hello everyone,
i am new in OpenFoam user. I have problems in producing result in MHD case. how i can take out the result data n graph from the simulation? anybody can help me . |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
graph result, mhd problem, result file |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A new test harness for OpenFOAM | mbeaudoin | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 0 | June 17, 2010 10:36 |
critical error during installation of openfoam | Fabio88 | OpenFOAM Installation | 21 | June 2, 2010 03:01 |
OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found | piprus | OpenFOAM Installation | 22 | February 25, 2010 13:43 |
Problems in compiling paraview in Suse 10.3 platform | chiven | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | December 1, 2009 07:21 |
benchmark test case for MHD RT instability | cou | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 7, 2007 09:38 |