|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hi Foamers,
A Simplified geometry for my problem is provided here. I have an evaporator where water comes in from inlet and steam goes out from outlet. I wonder if I can define boundary conditions in the way that mass flux of liquid in the inlet becomes same as mass flux of vapor in the outlet. Can I use groovyBC? How? Thanks in advance, |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Przemek
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Hi BarCFD
Of course you can, however it should result from void fraction equation rather from boundary condition (but I might be wrong)
__________________
best regards pblasiak |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Andrea Petronio
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Trieste, Italy
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Hi,
we addressed this problem while ago. You can find the details in this paper: P. Sosnowski, A. Petronio, V. Armenio, "Numerical model for thin liquid film with evaporation and condensation on solid surfaces in systems with conjugated heat transfer", International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 66 (2013) 382–395, in which a laminar case is discussed. Then we analyzed also a turbulent case with LES in: Carlo Cintolesi, Andrea Petronio, Vincenzo Armenio "Large-eddy simulation of thin film evaporation and condensation from a hot plate in enclosure: First order statistics", International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 101 (2016) 1123–1137, and in Carlo Cintolesi, Andrea Petronio, Vincenzo Armenio, "Large-eddy simulation of thin film evaporation and condensation from a hot plate in enclosure: Second order statistics", International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 115 (2017) 410–423. Hope you can get some usefull hints, ciao |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Thanks a lot Andrea!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Charles
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
You either specify inlet mass flow flux or specify outlet mass flow flux. But you don't specify inlet mass flow flux using outlet mass flow flux. This doesn't make sense that computation could diverge easily.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Quote:
In fact the idea here is to verify the solvent for boiling in steady state condition. Assume that all vapor exits from boiler (to a condenser ) returns to boiler in the liquid phase. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Charles
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
That's incorrect setting. The flow can be arbitrary which causes your problem as there is a driving force outside of your model. You can measure the flow rate though or, if you have pump, you should know the flow rate from the pump specification.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
boundaries condition, groovybc, reactingtwophaseeulerfoam |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Basic Nozzle-Expander Design | karmavatar | CFX | 20 | March 20, 2016 08:44 |
Problem in setting Boundary Condition | Madhatter92 | CFX | 12 | January 12, 2016 04:39 |
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids | ashtonJ | CFX | 6 | August 11, 2014 14:32 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 06:28 |
Algorithm for coupled pde with all flux boundary conditions | benk | Main CFD Forum | 3 | December 28, 2010 05:09 |