CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

rhoPorousSimpleFoam LTNE segregated or coupled? OF6

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 6, 2018, 08:34
Default rhoPorousSimpleFoam LTNE segregated or coupled? OF6
  #1
New Member
 
Pamela Dahl
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
pamela is on a distinguished road
Hello, everybody.
I am trying to solve for compressible, turbulent flow, steady state, porous media, without assuming local thermal equilibrium. Thus, for LTNE I added an energy equation for the solid matrix with an energy source, linked to the fluid energy equation by the convective heat transfer term.

The enthalpies seem not to converge. I've tried making an internal loop (the residuals tell me that actually no more than 2 or 3 iterations are necessary), and limiting the minimum solid enthalpy.
To no avail: the relaxation factors I need just to make the solver run are terrible (0.00001, for both enthalpies). (I tried everything in the book: starting robustly/finishing accurately, the mesh is extremely orthogonal, probes to monitor enthalpies values, very low residuals to stop Simple: 10⁻8, etc.)

Has anybody tried anything similar?
Should I stop trying to make Simple work, and migrate asap to rhoPimpleFoam (adding porosity explicitly via fvOptions)?
Also, I have just found a coupledFvScalarMatrix class that Klas Jareteg uses to couple regions. I'd like to try that to couple the fields he and hs, in order to solve the PDEs at once, instead of segregatedly. But OpenFOAM 6 does not have it, it seems. Has anybody tried it? The implementation seems kind of cumbersome...

Many, many thanks in advance for any clue...

Here's my EEqn.H file:

{
int valori = 5;//number of calculations of both EEqns in one internal iteration.
int counteri = 1;//counter initialization.

volScalarField& he = thermo.he();

fvScalarMatrix EgEqn
(
fvm::div(phi, he)
+ (
he.name() == "e"
? fvc::div(phi, volScalarField("Ekp", 0.5*magSqr(U) + p/rho))
: fvc::div(phi, volScalarField("K", 0.5*magSqr(U)))
)

- fvm::laplacian(turbulence->alphaEff(), he)
- (hConv*areaEsp)*((hs/Cps)-(he/Cp))
==
fvOptions(rho, he)
);

fvScalarMatrix EsEqn
(
fvm::laplacian(alphas, hs)
+ Q
- hConv*areaEsp*((hs/Cps)-(he/Cp))
);


if (hs < minHs)
hs == minHs;//limiting the solid enthalpy at its minimum value.


while (counteri <= valori)
{

EgEqn.relax();
fvOptions.constrain(EgEqn);
EgEqn.solve();
fvOptions.correct(he);

EsEqn.relax();
EsEqn.solve();

if (hs < minHs)
hs == minHs;//limiting the solid enthalpy at its minimum value.

thermo.correct();

counteri = counteri + 1;
}


}

Last edited by pamela; November 6, 2018 at 08:36. Reason: Forgot to say it was turbulent regime!
pamela is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reasons for decoupling the pressure and velocity computations highlando Main CFD Forum 36 April 10, 2017 10:41
Segregated or Coupled flow? hamzamotiwala STAR-CCM+ 7 October 25, 2011 19:35
enthalpy in segregated and coupled naomi FLUENT 4 August 2, 2007 06:47
switching from coupled solver to segregated Oz FLUENT 2 November 8, 2006 16:02
Segregated or coupled solver? Nori FLUENT 0 September 29, 2005 14:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:48.