CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

SolidArrheniusReactionRate modification for Coal Carbonization

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Kummi

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 11, 2019, 08:49
Default SolidArrheniusReactionRate modification for Coal Carbonization
  #1
Senior Member
 
Kumaresh
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 348
Rep Power: 11
Kummi is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to Kummi
Hello Foamers,
My topic of research is to build a 1D mathematical model for simulating the coal pyrolysis in OpenFOAM. I have adopted the pyrolysis 1D solver based on FireFOAM in OpenFOAM-2.1.1. This 1D model supports basic data of the coke oven conditions as input and solves the heat transfer equation for both solid and gas phase by describing the reaction kinetics using the Arrhenius equation. For the initial case, the Arrhenius reaction rate for the simple reaction "Coal = H2O + CO2 + CH4 + Char" has to be calculated using the formula below,
Quote:
dm/dt = ∑(i=1 to N)[Ai*e(-E/RT) (Mi-mi)] --> (1)
The above Arrhenius relation for volatile gas release (from coal) is described in terms of mass fraction of all volatile chemical species (mi), where Mi, Ai, E, R and T are the final yields, frequency factor, activation energy, gas constant and coal temperature, respectively.

But, in openFOAM, the calculation for the Solid Arrhenius reaction rate described in $FOAM_SRC/thermophysicalModels/solid/reaction/reactionRate/ solidArrheniusReactionRate/solidArrheniusReactionRateI.H as
Quote:
ak *= exp(-Ta_/T)
which can be formulated as, A*exp(-E/RT) → (2).
I am not sure whether the expression in solidArrheniusReactionRateI.H [Equ. (2)] really goes well and same as above Equ .(1). Because the terms dm/dt and (Mi-mi) are clearly missing explicitly.

On the whole, can someone explain me whether the solid Arrhenius reaction rates mentioned in Equs. (1) and (2) are relatively the same or not? If no, kindly assist me to solve this problem.
Kummi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2019, 08:56
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Kumaresh
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 348
Rep Power: 11
Kummi is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to Kummi
Following the above message,

In addition,
I have looked into the code (OpenFOAM 2.1.1) and it seems that the source of pyrolysis modeling is built-in reactingOneDim.C file [~regionModels/pyrolysisModels/reactingOneDim.C], which solves continuity, species and energy equations. In the energy equation, the source terms are implemented with chemistrySh (total heat release rate), phiQr (radiative flux) and phiGas (total gas mass flux released due to pyrolysis). The phiGas was calculated based on reaction rate of pyrolysis gaseous species [RRg] and sensible enthalpy [gasHs], correlated with ODESolidChemistryModel.H file [$FOAM_SRC//thermophysicalModels/solidChemistryModel/ODESolidChemistryModel]. Based on it, the irreversible Solid Arrhenius Reaction is solved by the solid chemistry model in “chemistryProperties” file as shown in the attachment.

As per my insight view, it looks like that the reaction rate of species are calculated in ODESolidChemistryModel.H and called back in source file reactingOneDim.C to predict the phiGas (total gas mass flux released due to pyrolysis).
However, the involvement of mass fraction of species is not explicitly mentioned in the Arrhenius equation as stated above – which makes me quite confused and think whether my approach is right or wrong.

Certain tips or word of advice will be more helpful. Thank you !!!
Attached Files
File Type: txt chemistryProperties.txt (5.4 KB, 41 views)
summi likes this.
Kummi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modification on Ranz-Marshall Model for granular flow souza.emer Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 August 28, 2018 08:28
coal carbonization in beehive coke oven ramakant Main CFD Forum 1 January 15, 2018 07:46
Runtime modification of a volScalarField Scofield OpenFOAM Programming & Development 4 October 1, 2013 08:31
coal carbonization using FLUENT ramakant FLUENT 0 February 28, 2011 01:00
compressible modification of nearwall turbulence Quain Tchew Main CFD Forum 0 March 4, 2002 01:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:29.