CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

Openfoam nut and k_sgs equation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 10, 2020, 16:11
Default Openfoam nut and k_sgs equation
  #1
New Member
 
Graham
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
EnigmaFluids is on a distinguished road
Greetings, I have noticed while completing LES that openfoam uses the equation

\nu_t=C_k\Delta\sqrt{k_{sgs}}

or if you check WALE.C

this->nut_ = Ck_*this->delta()*sqrt(this->k(fvc::grad(this->U_)));

but where does this equation come from? I have been reading the original smagorinsky model and also WALE model papers, but I don't see it contained there. I am looking for a literature source because I want to know if this k_sgs is actually a physical quantity or just an intermediate calculation on the way to get nut.

For example, in the original WALE paper by Nicoud and Ducros (1999), we notice that the model gives nut alone and not k_sgs. However, I assume that openfoam calculates k_sgs first and then nut after, for coding convenience. I would like to know whether the openfoam k_sgs is a real quantity so I can estimate whether 80% of the turbulence kinetic energy is being resolved in my field via

\frac{k_{resolved}}{k_{resolved}+k_{sgs}}

So once again, where does this equation come from? Thanks!
EnigmaFluids is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 11, 2020, 21:25
Default
  #2
Member
 
René Thibault
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 2
Tibo99 is on a distinguished road
That is a good question.

As I expect to use the WALE model in the near future, I would be interested to know the answer also.
Tibo99 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2020, 16:46
Default
  #3
Member
 
alexander thierfelder
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 2
superkelle is on a distinguished road
Maybe this helps:

https://caefn.com/openfoam/wale-sgs-model
superkelle is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2020, 17:07
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Graham
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
EnigmaFluids is on a distinguished road
The actual WALE model as originally written does not use a relationship between nut and k. However, I believe that Openfoam uses the equation

\nu_t=c_k\Delta\sqrt{k_{sgs}}

for coding convenience.

I believe that this is from the so-called One-equation TKE model. Specifically read section 3.4 of https://link.springer.com/content/pd...016-9751-4.pdf

This paper references Bardina et. al. (1980) where a similar equation is found in Table 3 and Equation 15

This is all to say that once again, the WALE model does not use said equation, but rather I believe Openfoam has implemented it as a convenient way to get both k_sgs and nut during runtime. From this conclusion, I assume then that we inherit all the assumptions of the one-equation turbulence model if we are using the openfoam nut field to recover k_sgs. This is important since I am comparing k_sgs with a calculated k_resolved from the instantaneous fluctuations to determine how if 80% of the TKE is being resolved.
EnigmaFluids is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2020, 18:13
Default
  #5
Member
 
René Thibault
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 2
Tibo99 is on a distinguished road
That being said, it's a calculation? And not use for resolving the turbulence model?
Tibo99 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
les, subgrid scale modelling, turbulent kinetic energy, viscous stress

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:07.