|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 301
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Dear OpenFOAM users,
I am working with the compressibleMultiphaseInterFOAM solver, which handles N compressible phases with thermophysical properties. I have successfully derived the equations for ![]() If we look at the derivation for ![]() ![]() However, based on the concept of defining dgdt as compressibility: https://github.com/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM...am/pEqn.H#L106 We rewrite the ![]() ![]() Mathematically, this expression is equivalent to the one in the first image. But my question is: Why? The first expression seems more straightforward to me. Last edited by mostanad; February 6, 2025 at 22:23. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 301
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
No idea about this?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 301
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Well, I think I’ve kind of found the answer to my question. Including the compressibility of other phases in one phase's void fraction equation is important because the phase needs to account for how the compressibility of other phases affects its volume fraction.
In other words, this form of the equation allows the phase to consider its own compressibility while also incorporating the effects of other phases' compressibility, specifically at the interface, which is crucial for maintaining a homogeneous and closed system of equations. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 825
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problems at multiphase flows, emptying a bottle | mvo | CFX | 6 | February 29, 2016 09:28 |
Calculating mass flow rate at multiphase flows | Kuslo187 | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 1 | August 21, 2015 18:11 |
Difference of multicomponent and multiphase homogenous flows | Luk_Fiz | CFX | 11 | April 4, 2013 05:29 |
Using Compressible Solver (sonicFoam) to solve subsonic flows | ezsoal | OpenFOAM | 0 | October 27, 2009 09:13 |
Case check - Velocity-Inlet not compatible with compressible flows | fluent-user | FLUENT | 2 | September 15, 2009 08:46 |