Empty/Dummy term for equations?

Linse · January 10, 2012, 11:42

Just at the moment I am struggling with switching on and off equations/equation terms within solvers.
Just removing one or two terms from an equation by way of "XEqn += ..." is straight forward and works nearly every time for me (the other times are typos).

But sometimes it would be necessary to completely neutralise the equation without removing it from the solver as such. If I remove all of the equation terms, the compiler does what it must and complains/fails, because it cannot relax/solve an empty equation.

Is there anything such as an empty/dummy term (e.g. fvc::dummy())? A term that would satisfy the compiler and the rest of the functions but that would just rewrite the values from the last iteration step without any alteration?
Or if there is none: Who can help me building that dummy term?

Thank you for your answers already in advance!

stevenvanharen · January 11, 2012, 05:13

Why don't you wrap an if statement around the equation?

But more interesting, what are you trying to achieve with this? Why do you want to neutralize an equation without removing it?

January 10, 2012, 11:42	Empty/Dummy term for equations?	#1
Linse Senior Member Bernhard Linseisen Join Date: May 2010 Location: Heilbronn Posts: 183 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 15	Just at the moment I am struggling with switching on and off equations/equation terms within solvers. Just removing one or two terms from an equation by way of "XEqn += ..." is straight forward and works nearly every time for me (the other times are typos). But sometimes it would be necessary to completely neutralise the equation without removing it from the solver as such. If I remove all of the equation terms, the compiler does what it must and complains/fails, because it cannot relax/solve an empty equation. Is there anything such as an empty/dummy term (e.g. fvc::dummy())? A term that would satisfy the compiler and the rest of the functions but that would just rewrite the values from the last iteration step without any alteration? Or if there is none: Who can help me building that dummy term? Thank you for your answers already in advance!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Problem of SOURCE term gradient in UDS	wind	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	6	December 1, 2022 14:21
momentum source term	zwdi	FLUENT	14	June 27, 2017 15:40
Large source term in species equation	MACFD	FLUENT	4	January 4, 2011 14:16
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7	Joseph	CFX	14	April 20, 2010 15:45
bouyancy term in epsilon equation	Michael	Main CFD Forum	1	June 25, 1999 10:20

January 11, 2012, 05:13		#2
stevenvanharen Senior Member Steven van Haren Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 149 Rep Power: 15	Why don't you wrap an if statement around the equation? But more interesting, what are you trying to achieve with this? Why do you want to neutralize an equation without removing it?