CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Thermal, Buoyant, Gas-Mixing, Stead-State Turbulent Solver

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 6, 2012, 11:04
Default Thermal, Buoyant, Gas-Mixing, Stead-State Turbulent Solver
Edward Leonard
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Calumet, MI
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 14
iamed18 is on a distinguished road
Good Morning Everyone!

I've got what seems like a daunting task ahead of me. My project requires me to use a solver that can do a simulation of a hot exhaust plume (we'll call it type 1) being spewed into the atmosphere (call it type 0), taking into account that these are two different species with two different thermal expansion/diffusion coefficients mixing with Reynolds numbers on the order of millions.

Let me explain my thoughts so far (I'm new to CFD and have only been trying to grasp OpenFOAM for the past 3-4 weeks, so please point out my naiveties as I'm sure they are many). I should also note that I'm not only new to CFD, but to fluid dynamics in general. I've spent many hours pouring over material over the past month, as well as playing with the example simulations in OpenFOAM to try to get a grasp on some of the more basic phenomena in the field.

Baby Steps First
As it appears that OpenFOAM is the kind of package in which you must suck your thumb before you can sit up before you can crawl before you can walk before you can run, I've spent some time using different solvers on my mesh. I've been met with both successes and failures, but I remain optimistic (and really quite impressed) based on what I've seen so far.

My current state of successful progress has me using a modified version of simpleFoam, in which I followed this guide to add a scalar transport model for temperature. This seems to be working, and I've attached the corresponding 0 directory.

What currently troubles me: When I use the exact same conditions and geometry under buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam, since it has most of my requirements built-in (thermal, buoyancy, steady-state turbulence), the simulation yields remarkably non-physical results (I get speeds on the order of Mach 45).

So my question to everyone is: what should I try next? I have a feeling that the Boussinesq approximation might not be the best method of attack for my buoyancy issues (mainly because my temperature differences are on the order of 100 K). I also don't know if I should be trying to accomplish buoyancy or gas mixing first (or if the two should be tackled simultaneously).

Thanks for reading, and I look forward to reading your responses!
Attached Files
File Type: zip (2.3 KB, 8 views)
iamed18 is offline   Reply With Quote


buoyancy, mixing gases, new solver, thermal

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculation of the Governing Equations Mihail CFX 7 September 7, 2014 06:27
Working directory via command line Luiz CFX 4 March 6, 2011 20:02
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? bearcat CFX 6 April 28, 2008 14:08
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 12:02
compressible two phase flow in CFX4.4 youngan CFX 0 July 1, 2003 23:32

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:37.