CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Oh I thought I was trying to do something stupidly simple to start with... grrrr

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 3, 2013, 06:29
Default Oh I thought I was trying to do something stupidly simple to start with... grrrr
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6
DDB is on a distinguished road
Sponsored Links
ok, this is ridiculously stupid and I am unbelievably frustrated... I am a newbie to foam and I can't see me sticking around for long if this continues!

I have v2.1.1 installed, the official rpm for f17.

I have a channel, 15ftx7.5ftx3ft, a stupidly coarse grid for testing purposes of just over 21k cells. I have modified the file from the lid driven cavity to produce my channel in blockMesh.

I am using simpleFOAM.

I have done loads of tutorials, the problems arise when I try to do my own stuff

I want to have a velocity inlet and a pressure outlet. I want my velocity to be a positive (say 70m/s in x direction).

I have no patience with paraview, it seems totally unintuitive to me, so I am converting to fluent to check things as this works for me.

Why does my velocity inlet read into fluent as a pressure outlet?

Why does my pressure outlet velocity always end up equalling the exact negative of the velocity inlet when I have 'run' the simulation?

I can get things to work perfectly when I create the initial mesh in blockmesh, read into fluent, change the bits that are totally wrong, save as a case, convert back to foam and then run - but what good is that if I want to use free software?????

Please, someone, what is going on here?
DDB is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old   January 3, 2013, 06:51
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 6
DDB is on a distinguished road
I should probably add that I am not new to CFD, just foam.

I am using the following BCs, as in tutorials and this post

Inlet: U fixedValue, p zeroGradient
Outlet: U zeroGradient, p fixedValue uniform 0
Walls: U fixedValue uniform (0 0 0), p zeroGradient
DDB is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2013, 13:12
Senior Member
mturcios777's Avatar
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 733
Rep Power: 21
mturcios777 will become famous soon enough
The mapping between BCs going from OpenFOAM to Fluent and vice versa is not exact. If you are specifying your boundary conditions as mentioned in your last post, everything should work. Paraview is used mainly for pre-processing internal fields/boundary values and post-processing results; its not as useful for checking your boundary conditions.

Based on these boundary conditions, are you not getting the flow you expect? Could you throw your case up for us to see (only include blockMeshDict in the polyMesh directory)?
mturcios777 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TimeVaryingMappedFixedValue irishdave OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 29 May 3, 2017 08:59
SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates zouchu Main CFD Forum 1 January 20, 2014 18:02
Problem in running ICEM grid in Openfoam Tarak OpenFOAM 6 September 9, 2011 17:51
Start star ccm+ remotely with mpiexec Dagnir Siemens 0 November 24, 2010 13:33
Lets start the public domain CFD-Project! Heinz Wilkening Main CFD Forum 3 March 11, 1999 23:55

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:02.