|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
CFDGuy
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Hi Foamers,
When I run interFoam on a cluster I got the following output: Create time Create mesh for time = 0 PIMPLE: Operating solver in PISO mode Reading field p_rgh Reading field U Reading/calculating face flux field phi Reading transportProperties Selecting incompressible transport model Newtonian Selecting incompressible transport model Newtonian Selecting turbulence model type laminar Reading g Calculating field g.h No finite volume options present time step continuity errors : sum local = 0.0592593, global = -0.0592593, cumulative = -0.0592593 DICPCG: Solving for pcorr, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 7.78695e-11, No Iterations 221 time step continuity errors : sum local = 5.71578e-12, global = 4.65865e-14, cumulative = -0.0592593 Courant Number mean: 12.7285 max: 41.8982 Starting time loop ----- "No finite volume options present" what does this phrase mean? Does it have any effect on cpu time ? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 31 ![]() |
I'm guessing you are running a case without an fvOptions file. Shouldn't be a problem, just ignore the warning.
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit *Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Vignesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Darmstadt, Germany
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Dear Friends !!
I recently modified the surface tension force implementation in the interfoam solver and successfully compiled it. But when i run a case using this solver i get error as shown in the snapshot. The modification i made was instead of ![]() I made the changes in PEqn.H file in interfoam directory and the modified code is shown below (modifications are written in bold) Code:
{
/* New one to calculate laplacian of alpha*/
volScalarField lapalpha(fvc::laplacian(alpha1));
/* New one to calculate laplacian of alpha*/
volVectorField HbyA("HbyA", U);
HbyA = rAU*UEqn.H();
surfaceScalarField phiHbyA
(
"phiHbyA",
(fvc::interpolate(HbyA) & mesh.Sf())
+ fvc::ddtPhiCorr(rAU, rho, U, phi)
);
adjustPhi(phiHbyA, U, p_rgh);
phi = phiHbyA;
surfaceScalarField phig
(
(
fvc::interpolate(lapalpha)*interface.sigma()*interface.nHatf()
- ghf*fvc::snGrad(rho)
)*rAUf*mesh.magSf()
);
phiHbyA += phig;
while (pimple.correctNonOrthogonal())
{
fvScalarMatrix p_rghEqn
(
fvm::laplacian(rAUf, p_rgh) == fvc::div(phiHbyA)
);
p_rghEqn.setReference(pRefCell, getRefCellValue(p_rgh, pRefCell));
p_rghEqn.solve(mesh.solver(p_rgh.select(pimple.finalInnerIter())));
if (pimple.finalNonOrthogonalIter())
{
phi = phiHbyA - p_rghEqn.flux();
U = HbyA + rAU*fvc::reconstruct((phig - p_rghEqn.flux())/rAUf);
U.correctBoundaryConditions();
fvOptions.correct(U);
}
}
#include "continuityErrs.H"
p == p_rgh + rho*gh;
if (p_rgh.needReference())
{
p += dimensionedScalar
(
"p",
p.dimensions(),
pRefValue - getRefCellValue(p, pRefCell)
);
p_rgh = p - rho*gh;
}
}
__________________
Thanks and Regards Vignesh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Albrecht vBoetticher
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Zürich, Swizerland
Posts: 247
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
I bet you devide by zero in some cells, yust give it a try with lapalpha(alpha1) with alpha1 > 0 in all cells to try it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Vignesh
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Darmstadt, Germany
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Thank you Albrecht !! I found the error and corrected it
__________________
Thanks and Regards Vignesh |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | August 26, 2013 08:47 |
| [blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning | gaottino | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | July 19, 2010 15:11 |
| About finite volume methods for N-S | Lionel BRS | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 16, 2006 04:15 |
| Finite Element vs. Finite Volume Codes | Salman | Main CFD Forum | 9 | January 6, 2006 23:59 |
| control volume based finite element | araz | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 15, 2003 18:50 |