|
[Sponsors] |
February 20, 2014, 10:15 |
OF2.3.x lowWeightCorrection compatibility
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello,
I'd like to take advantage of the new lowWeightCorrection feature in OF2.3.x. I modified the AMI patches in polyMesh/boundary to include the lowWeightCorrection keyword: Code:
AMI1 { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 2 ( cyclicAMI baffleFaces ) ; nFaces 54328; startFace 6857788; matchTolerance 0.0001; transform noOrdering; neighbourPatch AMI2; lowWeightCorrection 0.2; } AMI2 { type cyclicAMI; inGroups 2 ( cyclicAMI baffleFaces ) ; nFaces 54328; startFace 6912116; matchTolerance 0.0001; transform noOrdering; neighbourPatch AMI1; lowWeightCorrection 0.2; } Code:
--> FOAM FATAL ERROR: Employing default values when sum of weights falls below 0.2 but supplied default field size is not equal to target patch size default values = 0 source patch = 54328 Code:
AMI: Creating addressing and weights between 54328 source faces and 54328 target faces AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min/max/average = 1, 1.0847458, 1.0000261 AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min/max/average = 1, 1.0847458, 1.0000261 Thanks for your help. |
|
February 20, 2014, 19:52 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Chris
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 14 |
I'm getting this error as well. I was able to run potentialFoam without problems, but when I tried to run simpleFoam I get the same error after displaying the AMI information and Selecting the turbulence model.
|
|
February 20, 2014, 20:04 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
I can confirm as well that when running my case without turbulence modeling (laminar), the error goes away.
|
|
February 20, 2014, 20:53 |
|
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Chris, are you trying to use kOmegaSST by any chance? I tried switching to kOmega and kEpsilon and both of those turbulence models work without producing that error.
I submitted a bug on the tracker. |
|
February 20, 2014, 21:44 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Chris
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 14 |
Yes, I was using the kOmegaSST model. I can confirm that there is no problem using the laminar model or using the kOmega model.
I've ran this case case using OpenFOAM 1.6-ext and their GGI implementation and have had great success. It's a little frustrating why this grid interpolation method is having problems with the interpolation weights when the extended version is doing it without any problems. |
|
February 21, 2014, 10:27 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Chris
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 14 |
gfilip, do you get this same error when you try to post-process results with the yPlusRAS command if you used another turbulence model?
|
|
February 21, 2014, 10:53 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
Just tested that, and yes yPlusRANS fails with the same error even though the simulation ran with kOmega.
|
|
February 26, 2014, 09:48 |
|
#8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 16 |
FYI: the issue is now resolved by commit 8fa487c
|
|
February 26, 2014, 15:52 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Chris
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 14 |
Just a quick question. If I installed through the apt package management tool, do I have to do anything to get this new commit?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Binary compatibility of OF compilations | Aleksey_R | OpenFOAM Installation | 1 | January 20, 2014 16:23 |
Older versions compatibility (1.5 vs 2.1) ? | xerces8 | OpenFOAM | 2 | May 24, 2012 08:20 |
Compatibility OpenFOAM 1.6 and 1.7.1 | Ale_galleria | OpenFOAM | 2 | September 20, 2010 09:14 |
Compatibility LES and Discrete Phase models | JADG | FLUENT | 0 | January 22, 2004 20:03 |
Compatibility equations | Stefan Maehlmann | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 22, 2001 03:39 |