Quote:
Thank you for your reply, I think this is quite unusual, the yPlus should not vary so much between RANS and LES. I'll go on digging the reason:(:( Xianbei |
Hi Xianbei,
I am wondering how do you set your initial condition for SRFSimpleFoam. Since I always get the computation divergent after a few steps. That the continuity errors become quite large. Do you have any idea how to overcome this problem? Thanks a lot! Best regards Ye |
Quote:
All the conditions are in the former replies. You should use 10-20 steps in one PIMPLE loop, which is nOuterCorrectors Hope it helps Xianbei |
Hi Xianbei,
Thank you so much for your quick reply. I see your conditions setting. I will try my case further. I still have some questions: 1. Did you use only one channel or full impeller for your successful simulation? 2. Is you simulation RANS or LES? How can the mesh is so less? only 0.3 million? 3. Have you ever tried MRFSimpleFoam? Do you think only one channel or full impeller works by using MRFSimpleFoam solver? Thank a lot again. Best regards Ye |
Quote:
2/ LES, structured mesh is used 3/ MRFSimpleFoam, this can be used in both one channel and full impeller |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thank you for your reminding. In fact, the mesh now is further improved to be capable for LES. The mesh in the two directions is refined with totally 1 million grids. However, the result is not good comparing with the result obtained in Fluent with the same mesh. ,especially near the pressure side. I changed the pisoFoam by add Coriolis force and centrifugal force instead of using MRFSimpleFoam to speed up the calculation. I think it's the near wall treatment that cause the deviation. However, the only wallfuntion( used on hub and shroud whose y+>30) is nuSgsSpaldingWallFunction , no further near wall models can be chosen:( Xianbei |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:43. |