|
[Sponsors] |
Partial slip Johnson-Jackson wall boundary condition OF 2.3.0 |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 23, 2014, 15:28 |
Partial slip Johnson-Jackson wall boundary condition OF 2.3.0
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Hello everyone
I am also working with fluidizedBed/RAS (twoPhaseEuler) model. I am using 2.3.0. In my simulation I want to apply partially slip Johanson Jackson boundary condition. My theta.Particles and U.particles boundary conditions (in 0 folder) are as follows for theeta walls { type zeroGradient; } for U.particles walls { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } does it mean no slip boundary condition ? If it is so, how can I define partially slip boundary condition. Also where to define "Specularity coefficient" |
|
October 28, 2014, 05:34 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Ramon
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Eindhoven
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello,
This is indeed no-slip what you have currently. If you want partial slip then you will either have to implement it yourself in v. 2.3.0 or you can download the development version 2.3.x from the repositories. In 2.3.x Johnson and Jackson B.C. has been built in already (I am currently testing it). You can use the following to set your Johnson and Jackson B.C. in U.particles: Code:
wall { type JohnsonJacksonParticleSlip; specularityCoefficient 0.50; // Or whatever value you want.. value $internalField; } Code:
wall { type JohnsonJacksonParticleTheta; specularityCoefficient 0.50; // Or whatever value you want.. restitutionCoefficient 0.90; // Or whatever value you want.. value $internalField; } As a side-not: I have been playing around a bit with this B.C. and for now it seems the simulations are crashing. My alpha.particle seems to exceed the maximum packing value which causes my radial distribution function to go haywire. If you notice anything similar please let me/us know. Kind regards, Ramon |
|
October 29, 2014, 15:58 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
Hello Ramon
Thank you very much. Your comment is very useful. Within a couple of days I will update to V2.3.x, then I will apply partially slip boundary condition. After that I will update my simulation result here. Regards mwaqas |
|
December 4, 2014, 18:10 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
Hello Ramon
I have updated OpenFOAM-2.3.0 to OpenFOAM-2.3.x. In boundary field, I cant find JohansonJacksonParticalSlip boundary condition. Here is the path where I am looking for it. home/waqas/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-2.3.x/src/finiteVolume/fields/fvPatchFields/derived Regards mwaqas |
|
December 4, 2014, 18:15 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Ramon
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Eindhoven
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 12 |
Mwaqas, I suggest you look in applications, solver, multiphase, twophaseeulerfoam. It should be there somewhere.
KR. Ramon |
|
December 4, 2014, 19:44 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
Hello Ramon
Thank you for your quick response. I found the boundary condition . Are you still facing problem of maximum packing limit or your case is working fine. I am running some cases, after completing simulation, I will post my result. Regards mwaqas |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
CFX fails to calculate a diffuser pipe flow | shenying0710 | CFX | 7 | March 26, 2013 05:13 |
natural convection | mehrdadeng | CFX | 10 | February 25, 2011 06:25 |
Slip boundary condition what is inside | normunds | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | June 4, 2007 07:45 |
wall slip boundary condition | Federico | FLUENT | 0 | February 6, 2007 04:12 |