NACA profile - problem with stability of computation
4 Attachment(s)
Hi!
I am quite new in OpenFoam and his world of pain and frustration, therefore excuse me if you find my problem silly. I would like to compute separating cavitation cloud over NACA hydrofoil. I have decidet to start with simplier singlephase simulation using pimpleFoam and realizable k-eps model of turbulence. Unfortunatelly, I met some problems with stability. I am not sure if I set the case properly, so there are my dictionaries at the end of my message. Could you give me some advices? Thank you ;) Simulation description Single phase flow over NACA hydrofoil Velocity inlet, pressure outlet full 3D geometry, Hexahedral mesh realizable k-eps model Problem description: Velocity exceeds reasonable magnitude in the area of the trailing edge. Magnitude of the inlet velocity is 2 m/s. Pictures of the velocity field and detail of the mesh near the hydrofoil are attached to the message. Attachment 35440 Attachment 35441 Attachment 35442 Attachment 35443 |
Hello,
try another turbulence model, e.g. kOmegaSST. H |
I will try to do following steps
1. checkMesh - dimension convert m/mm 2. check your BC - especially for turbulent quantities 3. change divScheme to 1st order and time scheme to Euler 4. decrease time step turn from pimple algoritm to piso VB |
Thank you! :)
-I have checked the quality and scale of the mesh, it should be OK -BC should be ok too -I tried to change div schemes and few other things -then I will try k-omegaSST What is the difference between pimple and piso, is there any crucial advantage of PISO algorithm? Have a nice day :) JK I will tell you about my progress as soon as I will have some results. |
In general: Increase nOrthogonalCorrectors up to max 2
or nCorrectors in Piso Loop, depends on your skewness angles Explanations for Piso vs Simple here: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Op...hm_in_OpenFOAM http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Op...hm_in_OpenFOAM http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/PISO |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:54. |