CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Sloshing Case - Probing or Sampling free surface during runtime

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 17, 2015, 03:34
Default Sloshing Case - Probing or Sampling free surface during runtime
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Esweer is on a distinguished road
In order to runtime post-process a sloshing case (3D) different options are available to sample the free surface in distinct locations inside the domain. I am currently using OpenFOAM 2.3.0 to do some test calculations for that.

Runtime postprocessing functions can be used in the system/controlDict for fast and easy determination of the values. First option is using the "set" function.

    type                          sets;
    interpolationScheme     cellPoint;
    outputControl              adjustableTime; 
        writeInterval           0.05; 
    setFormat                  raw;
        type uniform;
        axis xyz;
        start (0.000 0.000 1.000);
        end   (0.000 0.000 2.000);
        nPoints 10;
The above works fine for interpolating the free surface from cell (interpolation Scheme can be given by switch interpolationScheme), but unfortunately the probed set is fixed in space and there seems to be no way to move the probe location with the dynamic mesh.

Second option in runtime postprocessing functions is the "probe" function, where definition of single probe locations in a line can be done e.g. like this:

        type                       probes;
        functionObjectLibs     ("");
        outputControl           adjustableTime; 
        writeInterval             0.05; 
           (0.000 0.000 1.000)
           (0.000 0.000 1.100)
           (0.000 0.000 1.200)
           (0.000 0.000 1.300)
           (0.000 0.000 1.400)
           (0.000 0.000 1.500)
           (0.000 0.000 1.600)
           (0.000 0.000 1.700)
           (0.000 0.000 1.800)
           (0.000 0.000 1.900)
           (0.000 0.000 2.000)
        fixedLocations  false;
By setting the switch fixedLocations to true, the probe locations are again fixed in space, by setting to false the probes are moving relative to the dynamic mesh. Unfortunately, here no interpolation scheme can be user selected and the function is always using interpolation to cell, resulting in quite coarse resolution of free surface.

Therefore both ways do not seem to lead to what I am interested in, interpolating the free surface with cellPoint interpolation in locations fixed in the dynamic Mesh. Does anyone have ever thought about a solution for this problem? I guess so!

I have also tried to do the same with sampleDict or probeDict postprocessing, but obviously the switch "fixedLocations false;" is not functioning their in either case.

Looking very much forward for your kind help!
Esweer is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
free surface modelling using VOF sci Main CFD Forum 10 August 29, 2012 07:43
sloshing free surface Jaime FLUENT 1 December 2, 2008 13:12
Multiphase flow. Dispersed and free surface model Luis CFX 8 May 29, 2007 18:13
Free Surface Modelling (sloshing) fakir CFX 0 November 23, 2006 02:23
gravitational force for free surface flow Jongtae Kim Main CFD Forum 1 July 2, 2000 11:57

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43.