CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

What is wrong in this new Solver

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 30, 2015, 22:12
Question What is wrong in this new Solver
  #1
New Member
 
anas
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 11
AnasCFD is on a distinguished road
Dear interested,

I have added the Dynamic Mesh feature to the compressibleMultiphaseInterDyMFoam solver (OF-2.3.1). It is correctly compiled. However when I run a test case the results show that the fluid cells in the moving zone are not moving!. I have checked the case setup with moveDynamicMesh and everything was well.

Any idea is welcome. The new solver is attached.

Many thanks in advance
Attached Files
File Type: gz compressibleMultiphaseInterDyMFoam.tar.gz (13.9 KB, 12 views)
AnasCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2015, 07:24
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Matthias Neben
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Cottbus (Germany)
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 14
mneben is on a distinguished road
Hello anas,

have you solved the problem or got an idea of the solving it?

Matthias
mneben is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2018, 06:52
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 10
dzordz is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I compared your solver with compressibleMultiphaseInterFoam for a dam4break case.

You are not getting any liquid movement because your time step gets much smaller when you are refining compared to when you are not. Like 4 orders of magnitude. And it keeps decreasing with time.

The reason I think this happens is because you are getting this warning when you do the checkMesh.
"***Total number of faces on empty patches is not divisible by the number of cells in the mesh. Hence this mesh is not 1D or 2D."

This mesh error might be the thing messing this up, because in general time step should decrease only by a factor of 2 if you are refining for 1 level.

Have you made any progress?

Best,
dzordz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2018, 05:05
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 10
dzordz is on a distinguished road
Hi,

if anybody is still interested I made a compressibleMultiphaseInterDyMFoam solver (linux 4.0 version)

The solver works nicely for me on a dambreak tutorial.

CAUTION: this was done by comparing multpaseInterFoam with multiphaseInterDyMFoam and adding the same things for the compressible version. Those are incompressible solvers and it might be that in compressible flow some additional things need to be added.
Also the solver has not yet been tested, so use at your own risk.



Cheers
Attached Files
File Type: zip compressibleMultiphaseInterFoam.zip (68.1 KB, 4 views)
dzordz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
dynamic mesh, multiphase, new solver

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EMMS drag model UDF NAD Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 26 November 19, 2017 07:49
Quarter Burner mesh with periosic condition SamCanuck FLUENT 2 August 31, 2011 11:34
Working directory via command line Luiz CFX 4 March 6, 2011 20:02
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? bearcat CFX 6 April 28, 2008 14:08
What is wrong with turbo solver waynezw0618 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 December 11, 2007 07:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:50.